Nicholas Ni Kok
Chin - LL.B.; B.Econs.(Business & Accountancy), Post.
Grad. Dip (Business Law)
MAURICE
LAW
Dear
Sir
YOUR
UNLAWFUL INTIMIDATION FOR A NON-DEBT
I
refer to the above matter and regret to state that I have received your
harassing and intimidating letters of demand from you, the last of which is
dated 13.1.2013 requesting me to pay you a Non-Debt of $20,087.00 (the
Non-Debt). I deny any liability for the
Non-Debt and would like to offer you the following rationale:
1) The various courts orders
which cited you as the Joint Appellant with me are NULL and VOID costs orders
for which I have made known my intention to the various parties concerned
including you that I do not intend to honour them and for which I have appealed
against. It does not matter to me if the
various courts were to continue to ignore the law for no one is above the law and
it is our duty to make sure that we do receive justice in accordance with the
law (the Null Costs Orders).
2) The reason for the Null
Costs Orders is that the various judges avoided the issues that are before them
and consequently the Statement of Reason in the various judgments did not
sufficiently address them (the Deficient Statement of Reasons).
3) The Issues for the Deficient
Statements of Reasons are:
3.1. That your body corporate
Spunter Pty Ltd never had caveatable interests founded upon proprietary
interests over the Mt. Lawley
3.2. That your body corporate
Spunter Pty Ltd did have caveatable interests founded upon proprietary
interests over the Mt. Lawley Properties and the Hazelmere Properties of the
late Ms. Nancy Hall after her death because she left you an informal will (the
Posthumous Spunter Pty Ltd Caveatable Interests).
3.3. That your former lawyer Mr.
David Taylor misled the various courts in CIV 1142 of 2005 and CIV 1131 of 2006
with regard to Spunter Pty Ltd Non-Caveatable Interests and thereby caused me
detriment, despite Justice Chaney unwillingness to see the truth (the Professional Misconduct of Mr. David
Taylor).
3.4. The Non-Debt does not
involve the Spunter Pty Ltd Non-Caveatable Interests and the Professional
Misconduct of David Taylor but IT DOES INVOLVE the Posthumous Spunter Pty Ltd
Caveatable Interests (the NON-DEBT ISSUE).
3.5. I am not liable for the
NON-DEBT because the NON-DEBT ISSUE is not common between us in our Joint
Appeal: I was pursuing the Issues of the Professional Misconduct of Mr. David
Taylor and the Spunter Pty Ltd Non-Caveatable Interests. On the other hand you are or were pursuing
the Posthumous Pty Ltd Caveatable Interests (the Non-Common Issues of the Joint
Appellants).
3.6. I have given you and Mr
Christopher Stokes as solicitor for Mrs. Gannaway DUE NOTICE about the
Non-Common Issues of the Joint Appellants and both of you have chosen to ignore
it at your own peril. The remedy you
have is against Mr. Chris Stokes and the LPCC.
I am absolved form all responsibility (My Non-Liability).
In
view of the above, I now give you NOTICE that you do CEASE AND DESIST from
harassing me and intimidating me by making frivolous demands of me of the
NON-DEBT affecting the NON-DEBT Issue and my Non-Liability, FAILING WHICH I
shall have to commence criminal and or civil proceedings against you for same
without further Notice. Your comment
that I am hiding behind my “wife’s skirt” can be defamatory if you were to
expose me to public contempt or odium and if you were unable to prove its truth
in the due process. You may use this letter to right the injustice that was
caused to you as it was your body corporate that would be ultimately liable for
the Null and Void Costs Orders and not you, in the event Spunter
were to be found liable at all. You should
seek legal advice.
Yours faithfully NICHOLAS N CHIN
Office: 387 Alexander Drive ,
DIANELLA WA 6059,
AUSTRALIA .
Contact: p h:
+6189275 7440; fax: +618 92757440; mobile: 0421642735; emails: nnchin1@gmail.com;
nnchin@msn.com;
Skyp e: nicholasnchin2885
This letter was posted by me to Maurice Law on 20.1.2013 at 7.00 pm.
ReplyDeleteI have since appealed the matter and I believed Maurice Law had also appealed his case. The various courts has a duty to do equal justice and to help litigant in persons like Mr. Law to right the injustice that is being meted upon him. Justice is a slow process and it takes a long time before the real truth comes out in the open for public scrutiny. No one can escape the rigours of the law.
ReplyDelete1)The Corporate Body of Maurice Law Spunter Pty Ltd did have a caveatable interests over the Hazelmere and Mt Lawley Properties of the late Ms. Nancy Hall of which Mrs. Gannaway is her lawful issue and who has a claim over Nancy Hall's residuary estate only after Nancy debts have been paid.
ReplyDelete2. I Nicholas N Chin do have a caveatable interests based on proprietary interests over the Mt Lawley and Hazelmere Properties of the estate of the late Nancy Hall because His Honour Justice Pullin had already made the order that I be paid my solicitor's lien of Nancy Hall Estate in proceedings relating to CACV 107 of 2008. My solicitor's lien is for my solicitor's work done for the estate of Nancy and my continuing work done for that estate under conditions of emergency until this matter is finally resolved.
3) I challenged anyone who controverts me on my claim as the former solicitor on the estate of Nancy Hall in my capacity as the s.244 LPA 2003 salvour of that estate.