REPLY FROM KENN D'OUDNEY SENT TO DR. JOHN WILSON FOR THE LATTER'S RESPONSE AND ACTION?

 

From: Campaign@democracydefined.org

Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2013 7:48 PM

To: Nicholas N Chin

Cc: Sue Maynes ; David Walter

Subject: To Nicholas Chin from Kenn d'Oudney, DEMOCRACY DEFINED.

 

http://www.democracydefined.org/
The Home Page of The Democracy Defined Campaign
for RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of
CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY.

THE  DEMOCRACY DEFINED INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CAMPAIGN.

VERITAS, COGNITIO, IUSTITIA, LIBERTAS. 

Media and General Enquiries: campaign@democracydefined.org

 Kenn d’Oudney, Mrs. Joanna d’Oudney & Astra d’Oudney. CEO/Directors.

(Standard English Spelling)

 

ACTIVIST MEMBERS from all walks of life in
FIJI, NEPAL, SRI LANKA, SCOTLAND, AUSTRALIA,
CANADA, EIRE, INDIA, GERMANY, ULSTER, SOUTH AFRICA,
JORDAN, PAKISTAN, FRANCE, THE UNITED STATES AND ENGLAND.

THE CAMPAIGN PHILOSOPHY
is spread worldwide by its Members.
The Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics, attorneys,
doctors (of jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.) and judges (U.S. & U.K.).

~

Dear Nicholas,   We are very sorry to hear about your predicament. Unfortunately, yours is an experience only too familiar to the RESTORATION Campaign. Your interests and confrontation of the other lawyers with their alleged criminal infractions form a cause which should only be judged upon by disinterested jurors.   If you (and all people) were still possessed of the proper constitutional and just common law power to prosecute individuals within government for their acts and decisions, thereby bringing the decisions of the judges under the scrutiny of a Jury in Common Law Trial by Jury, then this constitutionally-correct due process would have been most likely to have produced a result more to your satisfaction.   This Campaign is for Restoration of the authentic Constitutional Trial by Jury which is not only utilised for defence against accusations, but is indispensable as the prosecutory means of holding those who work in or for government to the Rule of Law by which such persons' wrongdoing is brought to account. (The judiciary is an arm of government.)   Today, the Restoration of Common Law Trial by Jury constitutes the single most important secular duty of all adults.   Have you yet joined support the Australian Common Law Party ? It is (to our knowledge) the only Australian Party which is fully committed to Restoration of Trial by Jury. Contact ACLP Chairman Dr. John Wilson:  jhwilson@rightsandwrong.com.au   RESTORATION would produce redress and compensation for ALL causes deemed fair by our men and women in juries.   Yours sincerely, Kenn.   Kenn d'Oudney.www.democracydefined.org   ----- Original Message ----- From: Nicholas N Chin To: Campaign@democracydefined.org ; nnchin1@gmail.com ; Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 4:35 AM Subject: Re: Nicholas N Chin has left a message for you Hi Kenn: The WA Discipline Board for Lawyers the LPCC conducted malafides proceedings against me in VR 87 OF 2007. The Mala Fides of the the President of the State Administrative Tribunal Justice Chaney was asked to recuse himself when he did a bare-faced lying judgment against me. He did recused himself by activating his Deputy Judge SAT to continue to do the insidious job for him which he did by removing me from the roll of barristers and solicitors. I was asked to respond to his order confining myself to the penalty issue which the latter judge was proposing against me. I put up my written submissions, which I considered to be part and parcel of the appeal process i.e. my submissions against Penalty is equated to my Submissions against being guilty of the claimed wrongdoings (My Submissions). My Submissions is not being considered by the Full Bench of the Supreme Court of Western Australia which sat on 12.12.2012 to remove me from the roll of barristers and solicitors. It contends that I have have NOT appealed the SAT decision to remove from the roll. The mala fides of the LPCC are: 1) It disciplines me for contrived infractions whereas it does not discipline lawyers like Timothy Robin Thies, David Taylor and Pino Monaco for real infractions of the law. 2) It finds me guilty of sham dishonesty upon the non-complaining Mrs. Mathias who had withdrawn her complaint about a res judicata issue or non-issue that I had already a costs agreement when it did not happened. There is proof that the ink of the costs agreement’s impugned alteration was made subsequent after it had been drawn up. Indeed it is: the alteration was made after it was drawn up within a few minutes and with the presence of Mrs. Mathias. It contradicts the fundamental common law notion for a real finding of fraud i.e. there must be a pecuniary deprivation of funds of Mrs. Mathias and there was none. In fact Mrs. Mathias obtained benefits from me for which I had condoned her non-payment for my legal services (the Sham Dishonesty). 3) The Sham Dishonesty is just a ruse of the LPCC to get me out of the legal profession just because I had made allegations of the real infractions of the law by the three lawyers: 3.1. David Taylor for misleading the court with a forged document that he filed the impugned Writ of Summons on time in compliance with Justice Jenkins Orders in CIV1142 of 2005 when he did not. My client suffered a premature death as a result of the injustice she received from Mr. David Taylor. The various courts simply refused to make a decision on this barefaced facts that was properly brought before it. 3.2. Pino Monaco for misleading the court that he did not used duplicitous and duplicated bills of costs to effect the pillaging and plundering my client Dr. Kheng Su Chan. 3.3. Timothy Robin Thies pillaged and plundered my son Paul Chin contrary to the tenor of the costs agreement he entered into with my son Paul Chin. The lawyer refused to quit when told to do so and keep escalating costs for my son Paul. This case was finally won by me but the court refused to acknowledge that Mr. Thies has no caveatable interests to justify his strangle-hold over my son’s property and refused to order damages against him. 3.5. Both Timothy Thies and David Taylor misled the court when they unlawfully lodged unlawful caveats against the property of my son Paul Chin and my former client Ms Nancy Hall respectively, when both of these lawyers know or should know that caveatable interests can only be founded upon proprietary interests in the caveat property which both lawyers or their clients have none. They have thus misled the courts on the fundamental principle of law and are getting away with it. I have appealed this point but the Supreme Court is ignoring it. Armed with a summary of my grievance, I hope your Campaign can solve this “democracy” problem for me, which is my fundamental human rights to be able to earn my living as a lawyer. Cheers. Nicholas N Chin   "Better never to vote at all than vote for a person who does not make EQUAL JUSTICE the prime aim of government by RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of Constitutional Legem Terræ Common Law Trial by Jury." Click to read about the authentic Constitutional Trial by Jury Justice System.   Kenn d'Oudney is the author of books and essays including the following: Kenn d'Oudney est auteur de livres et essais y compris les suivants: Kenn d'Oudney ist Autor von Büchern und Essays einschließlich der folgenden:   MYTHS DISPELLED: AN OPEN LETTER TO JAMES MADISON (descendant). Essay: read it and see for yourself how the Constitution's Justice System is supposed to work to protect rights, liberty, property ownership and use, and achieve equal justice for all and discover... THE ILLEGALITY OF THE STATUS QUO. http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm   "Hi Kenn: What a magnificent article! I intend to incorporate parts of it into my speeches and writings. Yours in freedom and justice"Professor Julian Heicklen, Jury Rights’ Activist; Coordinator, Tyranny Fighters; U.S.   "Kenn d'Oudney is a brilliant writer and researcher when it comes to Democracy and Trial by Jury. The best source of common law is Kenn d'Oudney." Dr. John Wilson, Jury Rights’ Activist; co-Founder & Chairman, Australian Common Law Party.   "Superb. Should be read in every law school."John Walsh, Barrister-at-Law, Author; Constitutional lawyer (U.S. & Australia).     MAGNA CARTA, THE GREAT CHARTER CONSTITUTION; freely downloadable information about pan-European legem terræ common law, the Law of the Land, whose central tenet and sole justice system is the all-powerful People's Trial by Jury Courts, defining the true European and pan-Occidental Constitution.http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm   "Thank you for your excellent work on Magna Carta. What a masterly exposition." JOHN GOURIET, Chairman, Defenders of the Realm; Battle for Britain Campaign supported by The Duke of Wellington; Edward Fox, OBE, and Frederick Forsyth, CBE. "Kenn, Your rebuttal is masterly. Your essay is a very good read."ROBIN TILBROOK, Chairman & Party Leader; English Democrat Party.   "Thank you so much for this contribution. It is very much appreciated."ASHLEY MOTE, MEP (Member of the European Parliament); Vice-President, Alliance of Independent Democrats in Europe.   "Thanks, Kenn. I've circulated this." SIMON RICHARDS, Campaign Director; The Freedom Association; Founded by John Gouriet; the Viscount de L’Isle, VC, KG, PC; Ross McWhirter and Norris McWhirter, CBE.   TRIAL BY JURY: ITS HISTORY, TRUE PURPOSE AND MODERN RELEVANCE ISBN 9781902848723, with endorsements and edited section authored by U.S. lawyer Lysander Spooner;http://www.democracydefined.org/2trialbyjury.htm   SRC Publishing Ltd., London, available from world distribution by LULU of North Carolina.   THE REPORT, CANNABIS: THE FACTS, HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE LAW ISBN 9781902848204, co-authored by Joanna d'Oudney; Foreword by a Nobel laureate former Official Adviser to the U.S. government; endorsed by a Professor of Physiology Fellow of the Royal Society, academics, doctors (of a variety of disciplines) and judges (U.S. & U.K.); Softback, 260 large-size pages.http://www.democracydefined.org/1report.htm   “You have done a splendid job of producing a comprehensive summary of the evidence documenting that the prohibition of the production, sale and use of cannabis is utterly unjustified and produces many harmful effects. Any impartial person reading your REPORT will almost certainly end up favouring the re-legalisation of cannabis.”NOBEL LAUREATE PROFESSOR MILTON FRIEDMAN, former Economics’ Adviser to U.S. government; Author, video and TV series writer and presenter; Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace; Professor Emeritus, University of Chicago.   “You represent a worthy part of the fight in many countries for the logical and beneficial use of cannabis. I thank you for that.”PROFESSOR PATRICK D. WALL, M.D., Author; Professor of Physiology, UMDS St. Thomas's (Teaching) Hospital, London; Fellow of the Royal Society; DM, FRCP.   “I did enjoy reading it. THE REPORT should contribute much.”THE HON. JONATHON PORRITT, Bt., former Adviser to U.K. government on Environment; Author; Founder, Friends of the Earth; TV series writer and presenter. SRC Publishing Ltd., London, available here from world distribution by LULU of North Carolina. Available as a textbook. SO YOU THOUGHT CANNABIS PROHIBITION HAS NO EFFECT UPON YOU ?   THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204: Part (chapter) Two  contains the unprecedented (new) Cannabis Biomass Energy Equation (CBEE; Modern Uses) which proves the clean-combusting production-cost-free, i.e., FREE, cannabis by-product pyrolytic CH3OH is the immediate non-polluting, renewable, total world replacement for fossils and uranium, whilst macro-cultivation simultaneously significantly increases world production of staple seed food (protein-rich; no relaxant in seed). The CBEE exposes the bankowner-corporate-government monumental ulterior motive behind fraudulent prohibition. 'Prohibition' is a venal, cartel-fabricated subterfuge; a false fuel-energy MONOPOLY.   The CBEE Formulation proffers CH3OH oil-gasoline-type fuel combustion for all power-station, industrial, land, sea and air transportation and domestic energy supply, with ZERO net atmospheric increase of CO2. Viz. the CBEE thereby simultaneously demonstrates governments’ mendacity in their claims to wish to reduce carbon emissions, and proves the “eco” and “carbon taxes” to be fraudulent: a criminal government imposture completely without foundation. The misuse of exorbitant, world-economy-depressing fossils and uranium as ‘fuel’ is potentially catastrophic, legally and economically unjustifiable, and requires to be prohibited forthwith. See pyrolysis diagrams, photo, equation, etc.   Part Six of THE REPORT, PROHIBITION: THE PROGENITOR OF CRIME. "To cause crime to occur is to be accountable for the crime, morally and legally. To consent to any measure is to share responsibility for its results." Legalised, cannabis grows anywhere: the benign herb's foliage and flowers come free or at an insignificant price, but yielding no revenues to government and no profits to corporations. However, prohibition creates the Black Market: the Economic Effects of Prohibition (scarcity + enforcement, etc.) augment "street" value by 3000% plus, making all Black Market associated crime inevitable. The political commodities' prohibition, the War on Drugs, rather that is to say, the politicians who pass and the judiciaries who maintain the legislation engender (cause) and are culpable for not less than 75 - 80 percent of all crimes (official statistics) throughout the West.   EXONERATIVE FINDINGS OF FACT; Official Empirical Research; THE REPORT collates the medico-scientific Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the government-funded clinical studies conducted by world-respected research and academic institutions into non-toxic, non-addictive natural herb cannabis (differentiated from pharmaceutical laboratory toxic product THC). The investigations' empirical evidence exonerates cannabis from all allegations of 'harm' and 'impairment' (including tests on simulated driving) exempting cannabis from all legislative criteria of control ('prohibition'). All citizens persecuted thereunder are due Amnesty and Restitution (as for other Wrongful Penalisation).   MEDICATION: Efficacious in over 100 adverse medical conditions (viz. Official Pharmacopoeias) including applications which are life-saving, preserve eyesight, Curative and/or Preventive, and with potential cheaply to replace numerous lines of lucrative but ineffective, debilitating, addictive, toxic pharmaceuticals, rendering massive financial government-corporate ulterior revenue and profit motive (trillions) behind apocryphal prohibition by perjurious derogation. + Medical Case Histories.   Six Parts (chapters) include expert documentary, legal, academic, scientific, technical, medical, economic, social, criminological, philosophical evidence, and that which is based on grounds of equity, vindicating all private cultivation, trade, possession and use, and which further exposes perjury and venality behind prohibition 'legislation', all acts of enforcement constituting crime per se.   Part Seven, RESTORATION: JUSTICE AND THE CONSTITUTION, exposes corruption, ineptitude and injustice in the justice process; examines Law: natural law, supreme secular legem terræ Constitutional common law, treaties, statutes; quotes presidents, judges, lawyers and chief justices.   THE REPORT is regularly presented pre-trial by defendants to courts (judges) who routinely forbid all Findings of Fact, evidence and defences which "dispute the legality of the law" before the jury. The official and expert evidence in THE REPORT establishes the apocryphal, illegal nature of the legislation. THE REPORT quotes legal grounds (national and international) which demonstrate numerous infractions of laws by the prohibition legislation, and which show all acts of its enforcement to be crime per se. All citizens persecuted thereunder are due Amnesty and Restitution (as for other Wrongful Penalisation). This textbook demonstrates in the law: injustice, inequity, invalidity, adverse effects, venal ulterior motive, perjury, fallacious derogation, and the inherent illegality of law which creates the Black Market and engenders all associated crime. The outcomes of this procedure of presenting THE REPORT as documentary evidence to the judge have proved beneficial in the extreme for defendants. *Courts require documentary evidence presented as the published textbook (not copies or e-book).   WE THE PEOPLE AND THE MATTER OF WORDS; freely downloadable, indispensable information for the creation and sustainment of legitimate government and society;http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm         THE CONSTITUTION TREATISE: Why the d'Estaing ('European') Constitution-Treaty Is the Antithesis of Democracy ISBN 9781902848747, see website for endorsements by U.S. & U.K. cognoscenti; http://www.democracydefined.org/5constitution.htm    "The d’Oudney analysis is as insightful as it is comprehensive. It will stand for years to come as the definitive critique of the European Constitution prepared by Giscard d’Estaing and others. I look forward to sharing the d’Oudney analysis with my colleagues."HOWARD PHILLIPS, Founder, U.S. Constitution Party; three-time presidential nominee; Chairman, Conservative Caucus. SRC Publishing Ltd., London.   THE PRINCIPAL TENETS OF THE CONSTITUTIONS OF DEMOCRACIES, An essay by Kenn d’Oudney. Educational Information Series EIS#28. http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm   DEMOCRACY DEFINED: ON THE ETYMOLOGY, HISTORY AND SIGNIFICATION OF THE WORD DEMOCRACY; the Sciences of Etymology, Semantics, Semasiology, and Philology determine whether your country is a definitive democracy or your government is a despotism. Viz. The word ‘democracy’ is widely abused and ‘defined’ incorrectly: Democracy is a state of society realised neither by referenda (mass voting for new laws), nor by suffrage (electoral voting for representatives), nor by representatives’ majorities’ legislatorial voting. Electoral voting, majority rule and ‘consensus politics’ neither create nor define democracy. This essay defines and summarises the unique signification and inestimable value to the human race of genuine Constitutional Democracy. http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign.htm#democracy   9-11 TRUTH LINKS COMPENDIUM; exposition with select video analysis & lectures; contributions by professors, architects, scientists, Federal Aviation Authority experts, former CIA, FBI, military and government officials, firemen, reporters and other eye-witnesses present; freely download this Compendium which serves as an introduction to the subject, and as a source of additional references for those already familiar with the 9/11 Truth Movement. Note: The addresses do change from time to time. If you find the link broken, then paste the TITLE of the video given in our text into your browser and find the documentary video that way. http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm   IN PROTECTION OF AUSTRALIANS’ RIGHTS IN GENERAL AND THE RIGHTS OF HOME OWNERS AND FARMERS IN PARTICULAR. http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm THE VALUE OR OTHERWISE OF LAW DICTIONARIES; part of the contents of a forthcoming book to be published by SRC Publishing. It is nevertheless, for the time being anyway, downloadable for free;http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm   ON REFERENDA AND MAJORITY RULE; part of the contents of a forthcoming book downloadable for free; http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm   RADIOACTIVITY FROM CROPS FED WITH PHOSPHATE ‘FERTILISER’ IS THE PRINCIPAL CAUSE OF CANCER; some Findings of Fact downloadable for free, extracted from THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204 (referred to above); http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm   CHIEF JUSTICE VAUGHAN'S RULING; on perhaps the most famous trial in history; Juror's Rights and Duty and photo of the Old Bailey Commemorative Plaque;http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign2.htm#intervention   WHY THE LEGAL PROFESSION CANNOT DEFEND YOU; consider some of the judicable breaches of common law and Constitution to which modern government resorts in order to enforce its inequitable, illegal, and money-motivated statutes; http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign4.htm#lawyers   Further reading on the website: http://www.democracydefined.org/ The Home Page of The not-for-profit Educational Campaign for RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY. The Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics, attorneys, doctors (of jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.) and judges ( U.S . & U.K.). Join the Campaign ! Download and distribute free posters and educational pamphlets. Membership gratis.