MAYNES V CASEY

MAYNES V CASEY There are 5 ways for one person to pass property on to another person: 1. a gift 2. an act of inheritance through a signed and witnessed Will & Testament. 3. a signed contract of sale 4. a signed and sealed court order 5. a crime. Every court order removes property from one man and gives it to another. Whether through a fine, the removal of property of some kind, the jailing of a man’s body. Our common law guarantees that only a man or woman in the role of a Stipendiary Magistrate or a Justice can do that. And that person must have a Commission sealed with the Royal Seal which holds the power of the Magna Carta and the Habeas Corpus Act 1862, guaranteeing justice has been done. For that Stipendiary Magistrate or Justice to prove they have that lawful authority to take your property, they must sign the order and it must carry the seal of the common law jurisdiction, the Law of the Land of the Commonwealth of Australia. 23rd December 2010: Judge Margaret Sidis, a coram in a civil law jurisdiction, stated on paper: “The plaintiffs are to pay the defendants’ costs of the proceedings as assessed or agreed.” A Coram is a person that is not a judge, acting as a judge. Coram Margaret Sidis did not, and has never, signed that order. In fact, no justice or Stipendiary Magistrate has signed that order to this day. 27th July 2012: Sally Nash, from SALLY NASH & CO LAWYERS, on behalf of Geoffrey John Casey & Samuel Ian Casey, began an action to recover $141,196.59 from us. 1st November 2012: Registrar Tesoriero of the Federal Magistrates Court, stated on paper that we were bankrupt. No Stipendiary Magistrate or Justice signed that document, nor was it sealed. It was a piece of paper with typing on it. In a phone conversation with a particular judge in that court during the following week, he stated, no judge has signed that order and no judge will sign that order. The High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia stated in 4 CLR (important) cases that a Registrar does not have the power to authorise an order and cannot constitutionally be given that power. Therefore, unless a stipendiary magistrate or a justice, signs the order, it is null and void and any action that proceeds is criminal. November 2012 to current 2013: Using that null and void piece of typing, unsigned by any judge in the Federal Court: 1. Geoffrey & Samuel Casey’s lawyer Sally Nash, appointed trustees over our estate - Andrew John Scott and Scott Darren Pascoe of PPB Advisory. 2. Paul Devery, the General Manager of Cowra Shire Council, and Bill West, Mayor of Cowra Shire Council, sacked Sue from her elected position as a Councillor. 3. Janine Finlayson, Editor of the Cowra Guardian viciously and with intent maligned the good name of Sue in that newspaper. 4. Andrew John Scott and Scott Darren Pascoe of PPB Advisory, placed a caveat over our property, taking our interest in our land, but leaving us to continue paying the mortgage. 5. Andrew John Scott and Scott Darren Pascoe of PPB Advisory offered our property to a neighbour, Alison Le Mesurier, a mate of Geoffrey Casey. 6. Westpac Bank froze our wage account. On being informed of the null and void order, Larnie Mulford, the manager, contacted us 2 weeks later with an order signed by Registrar Tesoriero, from Andrew John Scott and Scott Darren Pascoe of PPB Advisory. That bank still holds approx $2,500 of our wages & refuses to release it. 7. Geoffrey & Samuel Casey’s lawyer Sally Nash & Co, who is now also acting for Scott Darren Pascoe and Andrew John Scott., forwarded a document, wherein Andrew John Scott and Scott Darren Pascoe of PPB Advisory, issued a NOTICE TO VACATE, signed by Scott Darren Pascoe. 8. Vesna Bosancic, a Compliance Investigator Enforcement Officer from ITSA (Insolvency & Trustee Service Australia) has been harassing us stating we needed to fill out government forms listing all our assets. Vesna was informed that she was using that null & void order to make her demands and 2 weeks later she too had received an order signed by the Registrar, from (you guessed it) Andrew John Scott and Scott Darren Pascoe of PPB Advisory. 9. Sally Nash, acting for Scott Darren Pascoe and Andrew John Scott, filed a Claim to seize our property and have us removed. The order used here was also signed by the Registrar but was a different document to that supplied by the Westpac Bank. 10. Scott Darren Pascoe and Andrew John Scott have taken our names off the Certificates of Title to our land and replaced them with their own. There is absolutely no mention of their positions or the company they worked for. These 2 men now claim ownership of our property. 11. The Sheriff of New South Wales, Orange office, Sergeant Michael Carpenter, has stated in writing – “All occupants are hereby given notice that they must vacate the premises prior to 11:00:00 AM on Tuesday 8 October 2103, otherwise action will proceed to evict you without further warning. There is no further extensions to this time frame unless initiated by the Plaintiff.” Later November 2012: An article in the Cowra Community News, edited by ex-councillor , entitled $20,000 Out Of Pocket. (you can read this article at the end of this newsletter). 1. In this article Geoffrey Casey stated “costs for he and his son….amounted to about $20,000.” 2. Geoffrey Casey stated that “he will not receive any of that money, but will be out of pocket by $20,000.” 3. Geoffrey Casey stated that the costs of $141,196.59 belonged to his solicitors. 4. Geoffrey Casey had contracted with defence barrister Julian Trebeck from YELDHAM PRICE O’BRIEN LUSK, a major legal firm specialising in the areas of professional liability, legal malpractice and insurance litigation. Currently at 17th September 2013: We are expected to voluntarily vacate our home for 37 years on the orders of an unsigned piece of paper with typing on it. These are the facts Geoffrey Casey has presented: 1. Judge Margaret Sidis ordered that we should pay Geoffrey John Casey and Samuel Ian Casey’s costs pending an assessment or an agreement. 2. Geoffrey John Casey is a solicitor. He knows that anything he states in public can be used against him and therefore must be the truth. 3. Geoffrey John Casey has stated in public that his costs are $20,000. 4. Geoffrey John Casey has not given us a bill or a costs assessment for that amount. 5. Geoffrey John Casey has stated that the demanded $141,196.59 is owed to his defence solicitors. 6. That does NOT include his costs. 7. Judge Margaret Sidis did not order us to pay YELDHAM PRICE O’BRIEN LUSK, nor did we hold a contract to pay them. Remember Geoffrey John Casey – in that article – stated twice, that the $141,196.59 is NOT his money. If it is not his debt, then why is the actual debtor not the one suing us? Our personal belief is this – 1. Geoffrey John Casey holds or did hold legal indemnity (insurance) as a solicitor. 2. The legal firm he employed in this matter was and/or is a firm acting for that insurance indemnifier. 3. YELDHAM PRICE O’BRIEN LUSK specialize in professional liability, legal malpractice and insurance litigation – not common law trespass matters. 4. Geoffrey John Casey did not have to pay YELDHAM PRICE O’BRIEN LUSK before starting this matter because they have already been paid by that insurance indemnifier. 5. Geoffrey John Casey is suing us to recover the insurance companies costs. 6. Geoffrey John Casey is acting in fraud as a third party collector for that debt. Geoffrey John Casey, in concert with the principals of YPOL, Simon Lusk and Robert Finnigan, Sally Nash, Andrew John Scott and Scott Darren Pascoe – is now asking for the amount of • $142,589.26 • PPB’s future estimated costs of $56,141.51 • our mortgage with the Commonwealth Bank of $138,000 • other unidentified costs Scott and Pascoe have valued our estate at $685,000, half its real value. • They will seize our livestock and equipment to be sold. • They will sell our tools of trade. • As bankrupts, our wages will be held at $40,000 per year for 3 years. • Anything over that amount they seize. • We are ’allowed’ a vehicle to the value of $6,000. • We can not travel without permission. • We will have a sad and sorry credit rating for 7 years. In the event we behave ourselves, the bankruptcy will finalize after 3 years. If we don’t, they can keep us bankrupt as long as they want. So this is our case for you all to consider. • Judge Sidis ordered us to pay the defendant’s costs. • She did not sign that order so it has no authority, but they have acted on it. • Defendant’s costs are $20,000 • Defendants have not asked us to pay their costs. • Defendants are bankrupting us on behalf of other persons. • Those other persons want $142,589.26 and other costs. • Our property has 12 individual titles, 2 – 3 of which could cover the supposed debt, yet they have seized the whole 12. • The potential total of their gain may be in the vicinity of $1 million. I stated at the start of this document that there are 5 ways for one person to pass property on to another person: 1. a gift Lindsay & I have not given our hard-earned home to Geoffrey Casey and his mates. 2. an act of inheritance through a signed and witnessed Will & Testament. Neither Geoffrey Casey or his mates are in our wills. 3. a signed contract of sale We have not sold our home and land to Geoffrey Casey and his mates, nor do we plan to. 4. a signed and sealed court order The court orders at every stage of this fraud remain unsigned by any man or woman holding any lawful commission under seal. 5. theft. We believe we are the victims of the crime of fraud and theft. Every man and woman in Cowra is now being given the chance to act as the Jury in a real-life crime that is being perpetrated against an ordinary couple in this community by a man who believes he has the power to do so. That man is a solicitor named Geoffrey John Casey. Geoffrey John Casey and Samuel Ian Casey are using the legal system to steal our wealth. We are in our early 60’s and have spent our lives working hard. Geoffrey John Casey may not be getting any of that $142,589.26, as he has publicly stated, but as the agent of this crime, as the person whose name is making it appear legal – I wonder what his share of the $1 million bonus will be? Michael Carpenter, the Sheriff from Orange will apparently be assisting in the theft by throwing us off our property at 11am on Tuesday 8th October 2013 and he will bring the police. Michael Carpenter will be doing that for a man who has never sent us a bill for his costs and using the authority of a piece of paper with typing on it. Common law is about the living folk protecting and defending other living folk from harm by criminals. We invite you all to be at our property on the morning of the 8th October, to simply watch & record a real crime in action. Bring a video cam, recording devices, etc. Please bring your own food, drink and toilet paper – we can supply the ‘long drop’ and a working barbecue.! 16km between Woodstock and Wyangala Dam on the dam road – turn at the signs. For more information, you are very welcome to Email: flora@reachnet.com.au Phone: 02 6345 1254 Sue & Lindsay (Sam) Maynes Berkeley Bullfrog Road Woodstock NSW 2793 ------------------------------------------------ You may all ask – why don’t you just pay the amount, why give yourself grief? The answer is simple, the debt is not ours and Geoffrey John Casey has stated that in public. We will not be made to pay a debt that does not belong to us. That would mean we have to agree to be robbed. That we will not do. This whole case is part of a class action seeking direction in the International Courts of Human Rights. Each of the people listed have been placed on their Vicarous Liability to provide the lawful authority by which they have pushed this crime against us. When the class action wins over there, each of them will be asked to answer that question in front of a real judge in a court of the People of the Commonwealth of Australia. Our trust and faith is in our LORD God who said in Romans 14:10: “So then each of us shall give account of himself to God.” The men & women of Cowra and District are invited to be witnesses in a real live drama! Maynes v Casey $20,000 out of pocket Solicitor debunks rumour of windfall in disqualified councillor’s court saga COWRA solicitor, Geoff Casey, has scotched a rumour gaining currency in the community that he will receive some or all of the $141,196.59 being sought from disqualified Cowra Shire councillor. Sue Maynes, and her husband Sam. The judgment is the result of the couple’s failed trespass action against Mr Casey and his son, and appeals to higher courts. Mr Casey, of Garden & Montgomerie, has told CCN that he will not receive any of that money, but will be out of pocket by about $20,000 now that the trespass action has been finalised in favour of he and his son, Sam Casey. Trespass proceedings were initiated by Mr and Mrs Maynes after Sam Casey tried to serve them with statements of claim when Cowra Shire Council sued for non-payment of rates, Mr Casey says. The co-defendants named in the Maynes’ action were Cowra Shire Council and Geoff and Sam Casey, claiming more than $750,000 for trespass and breach of privacy. The three parties defended the proceedings, says Mr Casey, but the Mayne’s the dropped proceedings against Cowra Shire and were ordered to pay its costs. Mr Casey says costs for he and his son to attend the six-day hearing in Sydney, including travel, accommodation and general expenses and loss of earnings from their work, amounted to about $20,000. In a Letter to the Editor received by CCN this week, Mr Casey says the hearing before Justice Dianne Truss, in the Sydney District Court, returned a verdict for both father and son against Mr and Mrs Maynes, who were directed to pay costs. But the couple then appealed to the New South Wales Supreme Court, Mr Casey writes “They lost the appeal. They were directed to pay the costs of the application,” his letter states. “(They) then sought leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. “They were refused leave and orders to pay the costs of that application. “Our solicitors (for Geoff and Sam Casey) then filed with the (New South Wales) Supreme Court a bill of costs which resulted in the costs being assessed at $141,196.59.” Mr Casey has told CCN that that sum, the subject of the Maynes’ bankruptcy judgment, is owed to his defence solicitors and not to him. http://www.cowracommunitynews.com/viewnews.php?newsid=2330&id=1