Monday, February 10, 2014

Further Submission against COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OR PIRATE SHIP AUSTRALIA, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Judicial Apartheid: by Lee Thuan Pham

Further Submission against COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OR PIRATE SHIP AUSTRALIA, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Judicial Apartheid chas x 17:43 (16 hours ago) to cp, indigenous, urgent-action, migrant, sr-torture, ie-internation., OTP, ethicsoffice, palestine, cuba_onu, chinamission_un, misionvene, missionecuador, info, Ben, FKLegal, Tamar_Hopkins, senator.brandis, office, robert.clark, Attorney, Minister.Misch., agd, Brian.Wightman, corbell The UN is the guardian of several new international standards addressing accountability and transparency, such as the UN Convention Against Corruption and the UN Global Compact. As such, we should practise what we preach. We need to preserve and invest in one of our greatest assets: moral credibility. A reputation for honesty and integrity is indispensable to the work we do. To contact us, please call our Helpline: +1-917-367-9858 or email us: The UN Ethics Office, The Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, James Anaya. Mr Alfred de Zayas @Alfreddezayas, Prosecutor International Criminal Court, UN Human Rights Council, Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the United Nations, Other Rapporeurs, Friends and Human Rights Defenders, Dear Sirs and Madams, 1. Further to our correspondence on the 7th February 2014. 2. Corrupt Racist Australian Judiciary, NO Oath of Office You will note that 99% of Australian Judges and Tribunal Officers have NO oath of Office, their decisions are based on their whims and prejudices. 3. CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT THE BANGALORE DRAFT o WHEREAS the importance of a competent, independent and impartial judiciary to the protection of human rights is given emphasis by the fact that the implementation of all the other rights ultimately depends upon the proper administration of justice. CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 - SECT 8 Recognition and equality before the law (1) Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law. (2) Every person has the right to enjoy his or her human rights without discrimination. (3) Every person is equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination and has the right to equal and effective protection against discrimination. (4) Measures taken for the purpose of assisting or advancing persons or groups of persons disadvantaged because of discrimination do not constitute discrimination. CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 - SECT 24 Fair hearing (1) A person charged with a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right to have the charge or proceeding decided by a competent, independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public hearing. 4. It is the Improperly constituted High Court Australia colluding with the Registrar, in abusing a mere court rule, that should be overridden by any human rights act, the Constitution and Judiciary Act, to deny every Australian from seeking application for “prerogative writ” of Mandamus or Prohibition; meaning that this is an (defective) administrative decision disguised as judicial decision. Mandamus will lie for an abuse of discretion where discretion has been exercised arbitrarily and capriciously or where discretion has been exercised in bad faith, Peavey Co. V. Corcoran 714 S.W.2d 943. In such instances the abuse amounts, in effect, to no discretion. Mandamus is warranted when the abuse is clear or results in a manifest injustice, Reis V. Nangle 349 S.W.2d 943.Mandamus will lie when an official refuses to act when he has a duty to act and refuses to do so. 5. The Improperly constituted High Court is complicit in the death of this man, as indicated in our previous correspondence Shocking video shows Gong Ling Tang left to die outside police station 6. None of their police officers are charged again 7. Their Police force cannot investigate themselves and their judges cannot investigate themselves !! 8. The UN Human Rights Council has a moral duty to do so. And the ICC prosecutors have a moral duty to indicate clearly why the charges against the Commonwealth of Australia do not amount to Genocide and Crimes against Humanity, espcially Judicial Apartheid. The people of Australia and the world will wait with bated breath. 9. The Human Rights Council and the ICC will note that in the video The Magistrate is talking about Court of Records, the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Victoria, doesnt seem to know what that is, Simon Whelan and other judge of the Court of Appeal have refused to authenticate their judgements and refused to release unaltered transcripts, 10. We will name them all in our next submission. including Garde president of Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal, I Lulham Deputy President and Wentworth and other Members of VCAT in a conspiracy to cause injury and deny medical care. 11. The High Court Case(s) are online here 12. CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 - SECT 39 Legal proceedings (1) If, otherwise than because of this Charter, a person may seek any relief or remedy in respect of an act or decision of a public authority on the ground that the act or decision was unlawful, that person may seek that relief or remedy on a ground of unlawfulness arising because of this Charter. inter alia 13. Australian Judiciary and their henchmen, Australian State and Federal Police, are a menace to Australian society. When there are lawful means to investigate their conduct, inept lawyers and human rights [sic] commissions fail to do so, and their Judges are impediment to enforcement of local laws that implement their obligations to international treaties. 14. Former magistrate avoids jail over sexual abuse of teenagers Protection of their pedophile and corrupt mates, letting them loose on unsuspecting public. There is NO no rhyme or reason or any of their decisions, ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS. 15. This amounts to Protection Racketeering; if we were to present more deaths in custody, we would be here for years!! 16. There is NO one to speak for ethnic immigrants in Australia; they came to seek new life, but Hopes for new life end in pain and premature death; and the Inept High Court Australia is refusing to declare what Laws is VALID; the High Court Australia is setting them up to fail, and in their so doing, calling them INFERIOR. 17. We seek an urgent intervention from the Special Rapporteurs, ICC and Human Rights Council. With Respect, Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung SIGNATURE Le Tuan Pham SIGNATURE The Ethics Office promotes an ethical organizational culture based on our shared values of integrity, accountability, transparency and respect. We are: Independent from management and all other UN offices. Impartial in how we treat individuals. Confidential with information that is entrusted to us. Professional in our dealings with our stakeholders. The Ethics Office was established in 2006 to secure the highest standards of integrity of staff members in accordance with Article 101, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations, taking into consideration paragraph 161 of the2005 World Summit Outcome and pursuant to General Assembly resolution 60/248. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba Permanent Mission to UN Address: 315 Lexington Ave, New York, N.Y. 10016 Telephone: (212) 689 7216 Fax: (212) 689 9073 E-mail: Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the UN Address: 350 East 35th Street, Manhattan, New York, NY 10016, USA Mission Directorate, 335 East 46th Street, New York, New York 10017 Phone: (212) 557-2055 Central(212) 557-3528 fax Email Permanent Mission of Ecuador to the United Nations 866 United Nations Plaza, Room 516, New York, N.Y. 10017 Telephone: (212) 935-1680, -1681 Telefax: (212) 935-1835 e-mail: Corrupt Racist Australian Judiciary, NO Oath of Office Shocking video shows Gong Ling Tang left to die outside police station

No comments:

Post a Comment