Saturday, March 14, 2015

MY APPLICATION TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT AT FREMANTLE THAT IT MUST REMOVE THE FREMANTLE/MINOR/944/2007 FROM THE INACTIVE LIST ON THE GROUND OF EQUITABLE FRAUD


Nicholas Ni Kok Chin 387 Alexander Drive DIANELLA WA 6059 16th March, 2015 The Principal Registrar Magistrates Court of Western Australia 8 Holdsworth Street FREEMANTLE WA 6160 Dear Sir CASE NO. FREMANTLE/MINOR/944 OF 2007: CHIN V THIES I refer to your Notice that the above case is on the Inactive List dated 7.1.2015 and that it will be dismissed by the 7th day of July, 2015. In compliance to your request that I file an Application to remove it from the Inactive List, please find the attached Application in Form 23. I believe there is no requirement for me to file an Affidavit in Support as all the documentary proofs are in the various files in the various courts where my various appeals have been brought into and they are self-explanatory. It is for the judicial system to correct itself and right all the injustices done to me and it is not for me to further progress with this matter as I have done everything possible that are needed to be done. Thank you. Yours faithfully NICHOLAS NI KOK CHIN.

2 comments:

  1. Fremantle Minor944/2007 be and is removed from the Inactive Case List pursuant to s.45E of the Magistrates Court (Minor Cases Procedure) Rules, 2005 (WA) (the Removal) and such Removal is based on the following grounds:
    1) The duress-vitiated Consent Judgment of Registrar Wilde in FR417 of 2007 dated 7.6.2007 is a nullity and is not enforeceable at law as she (Registrar Wilde) is at all material times aware of the equitable fraud as propounded by the Applicant through the expounded factual matrices of circumstances, by the Applicant, in the various written forms (the Equitable Fraud on an Inferior Tribunal by the Defendant).
    2) The Equitable Fraud on an Inferior Tribunal by the Defendant being a nullity at law and consequently it does not need not be set aside by the Claimant through an appeal process despite the fact that it (Registrar Wilde's Consent Judgment) had been appealed unsuccessfully by the Claimant (No Requirement to Set Aside a Nullity).
    3) A miscarriage of justice has since occurred as the various judges in the various appeal tribunals had avoided the issue of the Equitable Fraud resulting inthe Appellant being unlawfully declared a vexatious litigant and his name as a Barrister and Solicitor had been removed by the Court of Appeal from the roll of Barristers and Solicitors in LPD 2 of 2012 on the 12.12.2012 (Miscarriage of Justice to the Claimant).
    4) The Claimant has exhausted all processes of appeal and is now awaiting for the judicial system of Western Australia to revive its conscience and restore him to his former place, which may take men of good conscience working in the good governance to set it aright and it may take many years (Nothing Needs to be Done by the Claimant).
    5) An Equitable Fraud by the Defendant has no time limit for the survival of the Claimant's cause of action against the Defendants.
    6) Any other relief deem fit by this Honourable Court.
    7) Costs for the Claimant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the informative blog.. We can help you navigate
    through the pitfalls associated with being charged with any law offence.
    Geelong Criminal Lawyers

    ReplyDelete