MINTER ELLISON LAWYERS AND APPELLANT IN CACV43 OF 2007 ACHIEVED A CONSENT JUDGEMENT SETTLED BY BARRISTER TIM THIES FOR AND ON BEHALF OF APPELLANT BEFORE JUSTICE STEYTLER ON 25.9.2007.
THAT CONSENT JUDGEMENT INDICATES THAT JUDGE ECKERT'S DECISION IN VR137 OF 2006 DATED 12.9.2006 TO THE EFFECT THAT APPELLANT IS NOT GUILTY OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT OR UNSATISFACTORY CONDUCT BUT ONLY GUILTY OF DEFICIENCY IN HIS PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (THE CONSENT JUDGMENT).
THE CONSENT JUDGEMENT IS BEING IGNORED BY THE PSEUDO BOARD AND THE LPCC AND BOTH OF THEM HAVE CONTINUED TO PROSECUTE THE APPELLANT SINCE THEN. THE LATEST IS THE VR 87 OF 2009 MALICIOUS PERSECUTION BASED ON THE SAME MATTERS THAT WAS ALREADY HEARD BY JUDGE ECKERT ON 12.9.2006.
MINTER ELLISON LAWYERS AND APPELLANT IN CACV43 OF 2007 ACHIEVED A CONSENT JUDGEMENT SETTLED BY BARRISTER TIM THIES FOR AND ON BEHALF OF APPELLANT BEFORE JUSTICE STEYTLER ON 25.9.2007.
ReplyDeleteSETTLED BY BARRISTER TIM STEPHENSON AND NOT TIM THIES. MY MISTAKE.
DeleteTHAT CONSENT JUDGEMENT INDICATES THAT JUDGE ECKERT'S DECISION IN VR137 OF 2006 DATED 12.9.2006 TO THE EFFECT THAT APPELLANT IS NOT GUILTY OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT OR UNSATISFACTORY CONDUCT BUT ONLY GUILTY OF DEFICIENCY IN HIS PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (THE CONSENT JUDGMENT).
ReplyDeleteTHE CONSENT JUDGEMENT IS BEING IGNORED BY THE PSEUDO BOARD AND THE LPCC AND BOTH OF THEM HAVE CONTINUED TO PROSECUTE THE APPELLANT SINCE THEN. THE LATEST IS THE VR 87 OF 2009 MALICIOUS PERSECUTION BASED ON THE SAME MATTERS THAT WAS ALREADY HEARD BY JUDGE ECKERT ON 12.9.2006.
ReplyDelete