Wednesday, April 1, 2026

THIS PUBLIC NOTICE IS ISSUED TO PROTECT IRENE YOK MOY LEM — SHE WAS WRONGED, MISLED, AND UNLAWFULLY PUNISHED. HER GUILTY PLEA WAS INVALID. THE $55,760 TAKEN FROM HER WAS UNLAWFUL.
THIS PUBLIC NOTICE PROTECTS IRENE YOK MOY LEM — SHE WAS WRONGED, MISLED, AND UNLAWFULLY PUNISHED.
本公告旨在保护林玉梅女士 —— 她被冤枉、被误导、被非法处罚。
NOTIS INI MELINDUNGI PUAN IRENE YOK MOY LEM — BELIAU TELAH DIBERI LAYANAN YANG TIDAK ADIL.

WHY IRENE MUST NEVER BE AFRAID — BECAUSE SHE WAS WRONGED, NOT GUILTY

Nicholas N. Chin
387 Alexander Drive
Dianella WA 6059
4 March 2026

To:
Mrs Irene Yok Moy Lem
Dianella, Western Australia

Dear Irene,

I want to explain something very important to you — calmly, clearly, and with love. You must never be afraid, because you were wronged, and everything that happened in court was caused by other people’s failures, not yours.

You trusted a lawyer to protect you. Instead, he acted in a way that harmed you. You deserve to understand why, and you deserve to feel safe.

1. You were frightened, unwell, and unable to understand

On the day in court, you were scared, overwhelmed, confused, stressed, and limited in English. A good lawyer must protect a vulnerable client. Joshua Burton did not protect you.

2. He told the court you “instructed” him to plead guilty — but you did not

He wrote:
“I have received instructions from my client to plead guilty.”
This was false. You were crying, frightened, and saying you did not understand.

3. He hid your medical condition and fear from the Magistrate

He failed to tell the court you were under duress, medically fragile, and unable to understand. A guilty plea under these conditions is not valid.

4. He hid all the evidence that proved you were innocent

He did not present the 2015 City advice, 2017 retrospective approval, 2018 habitation approval, builder responsibility, CRIS report, or lack of criminal intent. This is serious misconduct.

5. He even told the Magistrate to punish you

He wrote:
“It is appropriate to impose a fine.”
This is the opposite of defending you.

6. Why he did this

Properly defending you would expose the City’s errors, the prosecutor’s misconduct, and the unlawful prosecution. He protected himself and the City — not you.

7. You did nothing wrong

You were a victim of fear, confusion, poor legal representation, and misconduct. Your guilty plea is void, and the $55,760 taken from you was unlawful.

8. We are now correcting everything

I have formally complained to LPBWA. They already opened a file in 2020 (R198/18). You are safe. You are protected. We are on the right path.

With love and commitment,
Nicholas


中文版本(简体)

Nicholas N. Chin
387 Alexander Drive
Dianella WA 6059
2026年3月4日

致:
林玉梅(Irene Yok Moy Lem)女士
西澳大利亚州 Dianella

亲爱的 Irene,

我想用最清楚、最温柔的方式告诉你: 你永远不需要害怕,因为你是被冤枉的。 法庭上发生的一切,是别人失职造成的,不是你的错。

你信任律师保护你,但他却伤害了你。 你有权知道真相,也有权感到安全。

1. 你当时害怕、生病、无法理解

那天你非常害怕、紧张、困惑、压力大,而且英语有限。 一个好律师应该保护弱势的当事人。 Joshua Burton 没有保护你。

2. 他告诉法官你“指示”他认罪 —— 但这是假的

他写道:
“我已收到当事人的指示,要认罪。”
这是不真实的。你当时哭泣、害怕,并且说你不明白发生什么。

3. 他隐瞒了你的健康状况和恐惧

他没有告诉法官你处于胁迫、身体虚弱、无法理解。 在这种情况下的认罪是无效的

4. 他隐瞒了所有证明你无罪的重要证据

他没有向法官说明: 2015 市政府建议、2017 追溯批准、2018 居住批准、建筑商责任、CRIS 报告、你没有犯罪意图等。 这是严重失职。

5. 他甚至要求法官惩罚你

他写道:
“适合对她处以罚款。”
这不是辩护,而是要求惩罚一个无辜的人。

6. 他为什么这样做?

因为如果他认真为你辩护,他就会暴露市政府的错误、检察官的误导、以及整个起诉是违法的。 他选择保护自己和市政府,而不是你。

7. 你没有做错任何事

你是恐惧、困惑、律师失职和不当行为的受害者。 你的认罪是无效的,被拿走的 $55,760 是非法的

8. 我们正在纠正一切

我已经正式向 LPBWA 投诉。 他们在 2020 年已开档(R198/18)。 你现在是安全的,你受到保护,我们走在正确的道路上。

爱你的,
Nicholas


VERSI BAHASA MELAYU

Nicholas N. Chin
387 Alexander Drive
Dianella WA 6059
4 Mac 2026

Kepada:
Puan Irene Yok Moy Lem
Dianella, Australia Barat

Puan Irene yang dikasihi,

Saya ingin menerangkan semuanya dengan jelas dan penuh kasih sayang. Puan tidak perlu takut, kerana Puan telah dianiaya, dan apa yang berlaku di mahkamah bukan salah Puan.

Puan mempercayai peguam untuk melindungi Puan, tetapi dia gagal. Puan berhak mengetahui kebenaran dan berhak berasa selamat.

1. Puan ketakutan, tidak sihat dan tidak faham apa yang berlaku

Pada hari di mahkamah, Puan takut, keliru, tertekan dan lemah dalam bahasa Inggeris. Peguam yang baik mesti melindungi klien yang lemah. Joshua Burton tidak melindungi Puan.

2. Dia memberitahu mahkamah bahawa Puan “mengarahkannya” untuk mengaku salah — tetapi itu tidak benar

Dia menulis:
“Saya telah menerima arahan daripada klien saya untuk mengaku bersalah.”
Ini tidak benar. Puan sedang menangis, takut dan tidak faham apa yang berlaku.

3. Dia menyembunyikan keadaan kesihatan dan ketakutan Puan

Dia tidak memberitahu majistret bahawa Puan berada dalam tekanan, tidak sihat dan tidak memahami pertuduhan. Pengakuan bersalah dalam keadaan ini adalah tidak sah.

4. Dia menyembunyikan semua bukti yang membuktikan Puan tidak bersalah

Dia tidak mengemukakan nasihat Majlis 2015, kelulusan retrospektif 2017, kelulusan kediaman 2018, tanggungjawab pembina, laporan CRIS, atau ketiadaan niat jenayah. Ini adalah salah laku serius.

5. Dia malah meminta majistret menghukum Puan

Dia menulis:
“Adalah sesuai untuk mengenakan denda.”
Ini bukan pembelaan — ini mengundang hukuman.

6. Mengapa dia melakukan ini

Jika dia membela Puan dengan betul, kesilapan Majlis, salah laku pendakwa dan pendakwaan tidak sah akan terbongkar. Dia melindungi dirinya dan Majlis — bukan Puan.

7. Puan tidak melakukan apa‑apa kesalahan

Puan adalah mangsa ketakutan, kekeliruan, kegagalan peguam dan salah laku pihak berkuasa. Pengakuan bersalah Puan adalah tidak sah, dan $55,760 yang diambil adalah tidak sah.

8. Kami sedang membetulkan semuanya

Saya telah membuat aduan rasmi kepada LPBWA. Fail telah dibuka sejak 2020 (R198/18). Puan kini selamat, dilindungi, dan kami berada di landasan yang betul.

Dengan kasih dan komitmen,
Nicholas

Saturday, March 28, 2026

Case Note: WA Police Delay & Resulting $30,000 Theft from Room 4

Location: 8 Stafford Road, Kenwick · Context: STRA Guest Incident · Author: Nicholas N. Chin

Section Language Jump
Incident Summary English Go to English
事件概述 简体中文 跳转到中文
Ringkasan Insiden Bahasa Melayu Pergi ke BM
Download PDF Download Evidence PDF

Key Evidence Photos (Screenshots)

Below are screenshots relevant to the incident (agreement, messages, and theft report).

Signed agreement 22 March 2026

Screenshot 1: Signed agreement dated 22 March 2026 ($900 due 24 March).

Messages about payment and timing

Screenshot 2: Messages about payment and Brendon’s failure to pay.

Message reporting theft about $20k

Screenshot 3: Jimmy’s message reporting theft (“about $20k… in call police now”).

WA Police Delay Resulted in Further Crime: Theft of $30,000 From Room 4

This post documents a serious incident involving a long-term STRA guest, Brendon McFarlane, and the impact of a police delay that allowed a further crime to occur at 8 Stafford Road, Kenwick.

On 24 March 2026, Brendon failed to pay the agreed $900, despite signing a written commitment on 22 March 2026. Because of this breach, his belongings were packed and he was required to leave the property.

On 25–26 March, Jimmy did not return to secure his room because he was waiting for police clearance after receiving a threatening message from Brendon. This delay left Room 4 unprotected.

On 27 March, Jimmy discovered that approximately $30,000 in cash had been stolen from his room. He initially estimated the loss at $20,000 under stress, and later corrected it to $30,000 after checking the bundles. This correction is consistent with truthful reporting.

The theft occurred during the period Jimmy was unable to return, which was directly affected by the police delay.


简体中文版本 (Simplified Chinese)

本文记录了一起严重事件,涉及长期短租住客 Brendon McFarlane,以及 警方延误 所造成的进一步犯罪后果。

2026 年 3 月 24 日,Brendon 未按约定支付 900 澳元,尽管他已在 3 月 22 日 签署书面承诺。由于违约,他的物品被打包,他被要求离开住所。

3 月 25–26 日,Jimmy 因等待 警方许可 而不敢返回房间,因为 Brendon 曾发出威胁信息。警方延误导致 4 号房间无人保护。

3 月 27 日,Jimmy 发现房间内约 30,000 澳元现金 被盗。他最初在压力下估计为 20,000 澳元,随后检查现金捆后更正为 30,000 澳元。这种更正符合真实受害者的行为。

盗窃发生在 Jimmy 无法返回期间,而这一情况 直接受到警方延误的影响


Bahasa Melayu Version

Catatan ini mendokumentasikan satu insiden serius melibatkan tetamu STRA jangka panjang, Brendon McFarlane, serta kesan kelewatan polis yang membolehkan jenayah tambahan berlaku.

Pada 24 Mac 2026, Brendon gagal membayar $900 seperti yang dipersetujui, walaupun telah menandatangani perjanjian bertulis pada 22 Mac 2026. Disebabkan pelanggaran ini, barang-barangnya telah dibungkus dan dia diminta meninggalkan premis.

Pada 25–26 Mac, Jimmy tidak kembali untuk mengamankan biliknya kerana menunggu kebenaran polis selepas menerima mesej ugutan daripada Brendon. Kelewatan ini menyebabkan Bilik 4 tidak dilindungi.

Pada 27 Mac, Jimmy mendapati kira-kira $30,000 tunai telah dicuri dari biliknya. Beliau pada mulanya menganggarkan kerugian $20,000 dalam keadaan tertekan, dan kemudian membetulkannya kepada $30,000 selepas memeriksa ikatan wang. Pembetulan ini selaras dengan tingkah laku mangsa sebenar.

Kecurian berlaku semasa Jimmy tidak dapat kembali, dan keadaan ini dipengaruhi secara langsung oleh kelewatan polis.


Disclaimer: This post is based on the author’s personal experience and documentary records (messages, agreements, and police references). It is published for transparency, public awareness, and community safety. It is not legal advice and does not accuse any person of a criminal offence beyond what is being investigated by the proper authorities.

For formal legal or police matters, readers should rely on official documents and communications from the relevant authorities.

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

⚠️ PUBLIC WARNING: HIGH‑RISK “CRYPTO RECOVERY” EMAIL RECEIVED ⚠️

THIS NOTICE IS PUBLISHED FOR CONSUMER PROTECTION. THE EMAIL REQUESTED BANK STATEMENTS AND A VERIFIED BTC WALLET — A COMMON PATTERN IN HIGH‑RISK CRYPTO RECOVERY APPROACHES.

SCAM WARNING: “Liquidnet Ltd.” (support@liquidnetcapital.com)

Date Received: 18 March 2026
Sender: Liquidnet Ltd. <support@liquidnetcapital.com>
Subject: Introduction to “crypto recovery services”


SUMMARY

This email is a fraudulent crypto‑recovery scam impersonating a legitimate financial institution. It falsely claims ASIC and FCA licensing, uses a deceptive domain name, and promotes an illegal “asset recovery” service. No legitimate organisation can recover stolen cryptocurrency.


FULL EMAIL CONTENT

Monday, March 16, 2026

TRILINGUAL PUBLIC NOTE – KENWICK SOUTH STRUCTURE PLAN & $252,000 CLAIM

ENGLISH VERSION

PUBLIC NOTE: CLARIFICATION ON THE KENWICK SOUTH STRUCTURE PLAN AND THE $252,000 CONTRIBUTION CLAIM

After reviewing the Kenwick South Structure Plan in full, including Sections 1.0 (Introduction), 2.0 (Site Analysis), 3.0 (Opportunities and Constraints), 4.0 (Design Principles), 5.0 (Land Use and Density), 6.0 (Movement Network), 7.0 (Public Open Space), and 8.0 (Servicing), I confirm that there is no clause, schedule, map, or requirement that imposes any development contribution or financial charge on Lot 701 (8 Stafford Road, Kenwick) for the construction of three modular homes.

Section 8.3 (Sewer and Water Servicing) only outlines general servicing principles and does not create any per‑lot financial obligation.

The Structure Plan contains:
– No Development Contribution Plan (DCP)
– No cost‑sharing schedule
– No contribution area map
– No reference to any $252,000 charge

Therefore, the Structure Plan provides no statutory or policy basis for the $252,000 contribution figure mentioned by planner Kevin. This public note is published for transparency, accuracy, and community understanding.


简体中文版本

公开说明:关于 Kenwick South 结构规划与 252,000 澳元费用的澄清

我已经完整审阅了《Kenwick South 结构规划》的所有章节,包括: 1.0(简介)、2.0(场地分析)、3.0(机会与限制)、4.0(设计原则)、 5.0(土地用途与密度)、6.0(交通网络)、7.0(公共开放空间)、8.0(基础设施服务)。

在整个文件中,没有任何条款、附表、地图或要求规定 Lot 701(8 Stafford Road, Kenwick) 在建设三间模块化住宅时必须支付任何开发费用或基础设施费用。

第 8.3 节(污水与供水服务)仅说明一般性服务原则, 并未对任何单一地块设定收费义务

该结构规划文件中:
– 没有开发贡献计划(DCP)
– 没有费用分摊表
– 没有贡献区域地图
– 没有提及 252,000 澳元的收费

因此,该结构规划并不支持规划人员 Kevin 所提及的 252,000 澳元费用。 此公开说明旨在确保透明度、准确性与社区理解。


VERSI BAHASA MELAYU

NOTA UMUM: PENJELASAN MENGENAI PELAN STRUKTUR KENWICK SOUTH DAN DAKWAAN BAYARAN $252,000

Saya telah meneliti keseluruhan Kenwick South Structure Plan, termasuk Seksyen 1.0 (Pengenalan), 2.0 (Analisis Tapak), 3.0 (Peluang dan Kekangan), 4.0 (Prinsip Reka Bentuk), 5.0 (Guna Tanah dan Ketumpatan), 6.0 (Rangkaian Pergerakan), 7.0 (Ruang Terbuka Awam), dan 8.0 (Perkhidmatan Infrastruktur).

Dalam semua seksyen tersebut, tidak terdapat sebarang klausa, jadual, peta atau keperluan yang mewajibkan Lot 701 (8 Stafford Road, Kenwick) membayar apa‑apa sumbangan pembangunan atau caj kewangan untuk pembinaan tiga rumah modular.

Seksyen 8.3 (Perkhidmatan Pembetungan dan Air) hanya menyatakan prinsip perkhidmatan umum dan tidak mewujudkan apa‑apa kewajipan kewangan bagi setiap lot.

Pelan Struktur ini:
– Tidak mempunyai Development Contribution Plan (DCP)
– Tidak mempunyai jadual perkongsian kos
– Tidak mempunyai peta kawasan sumbangan
– Tidak menyebut apa‑apa caj $252,000

Oleh itu, Pelan Struktur ini tidak memberikan asas undang‑undang atau dasar bagi angka $252,000 yang disebut oleh perancang Kevin. Nota umum ini diterbitkan untuk ketelusan, ketepatan dan pemahaman masyarakat.

Thursday, March 12, 2026

SUMMARY OF EARLY SCAM ACTIVITY (5–13 JUNE 2025)

Luna White • Rob Miller • DAXTODO • Anti‑Fraud Alliance

Between 5 June and 13 June 2025, the scam involving Luna White, Rob Miller, and the fake trading platform DAXTODO.com was already fully active. This period contains the earliest documented evidence of manipulation, false promises, and coordinated pressure to extract money.


🇬🇧 ENGLISH VERSION

1. First Warning to Anti‑Fraud Alliance (5 June 2025)

I contacted the Anti‑Fraud Alliance to verify whether Rob Miller and Luna White were legitimate. They sent only an automated reply and never helped — confirming later that they were part of the scam.

2. Pressure to Pay a Fake “Legal Aid Loan” (13 June 2025)

The scammers demanded 1,000 USDT upfront, contradicting the original NO WIN NO PAY agreement.

3. Fake Account Balances Used for Manipulation

DAXTODO displayed a fake balance of 43,562.28 USDT but blocked all withdrawals. When I refused to pay, they locked me out of my account.

4. My Bank Warned Me Not to Pay

On 13 June, my bank advised me not to send the 1,000 USDT. This was the first official warning from a legitimate institution.

5. My Attempts to Seek Help

I repeatedly contacted the Anti‑Fraud Alliance with screenshots, chat logs, and evidence. They ignored every message.

6. Coordinated Manipulation by Luna White & Rob Miller

The chat logs show fake “loan repayment”, pressure to buy ETH, refusal to honour NO WIN NO PAY, emotional manipulation, and blocking withdrawals.

Conclusion

This early period proves the scam was already active on 5 June 2025, the Anti‑Fraud Alliance was fake, DAXTODO was fraudulent, and I acted responsibly by questioning them and contacting my bank.


🇨🇳 中文简体版本

1. 首次向 Anti‑Fraud Alliance 求助(2025年6月5日)

我联系 Anti‑Fraud Alliance,询问 Rob Miller 和 Luna White 是否真实合法。他们只发来自动回复,从未提供任何帮助。

2. 要求支付虚假“法律援助贷款”(2025年6月13日)

诈骗者要求我提前支付 1000 USDT,完全违反原本的 NO WIN NO PAY(不成功不收费) 协议。

3. 利用虚假账户余额进行操控

DAXTODO 显示虚假的 43,562.28 USDT 余额,但禁止提款。当我拒绝付款时,他们立即锁定我的账户。

4. 我的银行警告我不要付款

6月13日,我的银行明确警告我不要支付1000 USDT。

5. 我多次寻求帮助

我多次向 Anti‑Fraud Alliance 提交截图、聊天记录和证据,但他们完全无视。

6. Luna White 与 Rob Miller 的联合操控

聊天记录显示虚假的“贷款偿还”、强迫购买 ETH、拒绝履行 NO WIN NO PAY、情绪操控和阻止提款。

结论

这一阶段证明诈骗在 2025年6月5日 已全面开始,Anti‑Fraud Alliance 是假的,DAXTODO 是诈骗平台,而我负责任地提出质疑并咨询银行。


🇲🇾 BAHASA MELAYU VERSION

1. Amaran Pertama kepada Anti‑Fraud Alliance (5 Jun 2025)

Saya menghubungi Anti‑Fraud Alliance untuk mengesahkan sama ada Rob Miller dan Luna White adalah sah. Mereka hanya memberi jawapan automatik.

2. Tekanan Membayar ‘Pinjaman Bantuan Guaman’ Palsu (13 Jun 2025)

Penipu menuntut 1000 USDT dibayar terlebih dahulu, bercanggah dengan perjanjian asal NO WIN NO PAY.

3. Baki Akaun Palsu Digunakan untuk Manipulasi

DAXTODO memaparkan baki palsu 43,562.28 USDT tetapi menyekat semua pengeluaran. Apabila saya enggan membayar, akaun saya dikunci.

4. Bank Saya Menasihatkan Supaya Tidak Membayar

Sunday, March 8, 2026

🌐 TRILINGUAL PUBLIC WARNING — RECOVERY SCAM ALERT

(English • 简体中文 • Bahasa Melayu)


🇬🇧 ENGLISH VERSION

PUBLIC WARNING: “Freya Johnson / TrustOryx / M2 Recoveri Ltd” is a Recovery Scam

This notice is issued to protect the public from a fraudulent email claiming that a company called M2 Recoveri Ltd / TrustOryx has “recovered” my funds and is ready to return $60,000 in cryptocurrency.

The email falsely states that they have “shut down an unregulated entity” and asks for a cryptocurrency wallet address. This is a classic recovery-scam tactic used by criminals to target victims a second time.

Key red flags include:

  • Unsolicited claim of recovered funds
  • Promise to return money in cryptocurrency
  • Request for a wallet address
  • Fake success statistics
  • Fake attachments and certificates
  • Suspicious domain: trustoryx.online

This is a scam. No funds have been recovered.

The public is advised not to respond, not to provide any wallet details, and not to open any attachments.


🇨🇳 简体中文版本

公众警告:“Freya Johnson / TrustOryx / M2 Recoveri Ltd” 是恢复资金骗局

此公告旨在提醒公众,有诈骗分子冒充 M2 Recoveri Ltd / TrustOryx,声称已经为我“追回” $60,000,并准备以加密货币方式返还。

邮件声称他们已经“关闭了一个无监管实体”,并要求提供 加密货币钱包地址。这是典型的 二次诈骗(Recovery Scam) 手法,专门针对已经受骗过的受害者。

主要危险信号包括:

  • 未经请求的“追回资金”通知
  • 承诺以加密货币返还资金
  • 要求提供钱包地址
  • 虚假的成功率
  • 伪造的附件和证书
  • 可疑域名:trustoryx.online

这是骗局。并没有任何资金被追回。

请勿回复、勿提供钱包信息、勿打开附件。