Further Submission against COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OR PIRATE SHIP AUSTRALIA, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Judicial Apartheid: by Lee Thuan Pham

Further Submission against COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OR PIRATE SHIP AUSTRALIA, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Judicial Apartheid chas x 17:43 (16 hours ago) to cp, indigenous, urgent-action, migrant, sr-torture, ie-internation., OTP, ethicsoffice, palestine, cuba_onu, chinamission_un, misionvene, missionecuador, info, Ben, FKLegal, Tamar_Hopkins, senator.brandis, office, robert.clark, Attorney, Minister.Misch., agd, Brian.Wightman, corbell The UN is the guardian of several new international standards addressing accountability and transparency, such as the UN Convention Against Corruption and the UN Global Compact. As such, we should practise what we preach. We need to preserve and invest in one of our greatest assets: moral credibility. A reputation for honesty and integrity is indispensable to the work we do. To contact us, please call our Helpline: +1-917-367-9858 or email us: ethicsoffice@un.org. The UN Ethics Office, The Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, James Anaya. Mr Alfred de Zayas @Alfreddezayas, Prosecutor International Criminal Court, UN Human Rights Council, Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the United Nations, Other Rapporeurs, Friends and Human Rights Defenders, Dear Sirs and Madams, 1. Further to our correspondence on the 7th February 2014. 2. Corrupt Racist Australian Judiciary, NO Oath of Office https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o55Wa8EpcqM You will note that 99% of Australian Judges and Tribunal Officers have NO oath of Office, their decisions are based on their whims and prejudices. 3. CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT THE BANGALORE DRAFT o WHEREAS the importance of a competent, independent and impartial judiciary to the protection of human rights is given emphasis by the fact that the implementation of all the other rights ultimately depends upon the proper administration of justice. CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 - SECT 8 Recognition and equality before the law (1) Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law. (2) Every person has the right to enjoy his or her human rights without discrimination. (3) Every person is equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination and has the right to equal and effective protection against discrimination. (4) Measures taken for the purpose of assisting or advancing persons or groups of persons disadvantaged because of discrimination do not constitute discrimination. CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 - SECT 24 Fair hearing (1) A person charged with a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right to have the charge or proceeding decided by a competent, independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public hearing. 4. It is the Improperly constituted High Court Australia colluding with the Registrar, in abusing a mere court rule, that should be overridden by any human rights act, the Constitution and Judiciary Act, to deny every Australian from seeking application for “prerogative writ” of Mandamus or Prohibition; meaning that this is an (defective) administrative decision disguised as judicial decision. Mandamus will lie for an abuse of discretion where discretion has been exercised arbitrarily and capriciously or where discretion has been exercised in bad faith, Peavey Co. V. Corcoran 714 S.W.2d 943. In such instances the abuse amounts, in effect, to no discretion. Mandamus is warranted when the abuse is clear or results in a manifest injustice, Reis V. Nangle 349 S.W.2d 943.Mandamus will lie when an official refuses to act when he has a duty to act and refuses to do so. 5. The Improperly constituted High Court is complicit in the death of this man, as indicated in our previous correspondence Shocking video shows Gong Ling Tang left to die outside police station https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4tH9Ij8FTI 6. None of their police officers are charged again http://media.heraldsun.com.au/crime_online_pdfs/OPI%20Report%20redacted%20TANG.pdf 7. Their Police force cannot investigate themselves and their judges cannot investigate themselves !! 8. The UN Human Rights Council has a moral duty to do so. And the ICC prosecutors have a moral duty to indicate clearly why the charges against the Commonwealth of Australia do not amount to Genocide and Crimes against Humanity, espcially Judicial Apartheid. The people of Australia and the world will wait with bated breath. 9. The Human Rights Council and the ICC will note that in the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o55Wa8EpcqM The Magistrate is talking about Court of Records, the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Victoria, doesnt seem to know what that is, Simon Whelan and other judge of the Court of Appeal have refused to authenticate their judgements and refused to release unaltered transcripts, 10. We will name them all in our next submission. including Garde president of Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal, I Lulham Deputy President and Wentworth and other Members of VCAT in a conspiracy to cause injury and deny medical care. 11. The High Court Case(s) are online here http://www.scribd.com/doc/179431172/Supreme-Court-of-India-to-teach-the-corrupt-racist-high-court-australia-a-lesson-in-civilised-manners-if-not-the-Rule-of-Law http://www.scribd.com/doc/116206323/Aborigines-Refugees-accuse-the-High-Court-Australia-of-Racial-Discrimination-Vilification-Predatory-Abuse-of-Discretion 12. CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 - SECT 39 Legal proceedings (1) If, otherwise than because of this Charter, a person may seek any relief or remedy in respect of an act or decision of a public authority on the ground that the act or decision was unlawful, that person may seek that relief or remedy on a ground of unlawfulness arising because of this Charter. inter alia 13. Australian Judiciary and their henchmen, Australian State and Federal Police, are a menace to Australian society. When there are lawful means to investigate their conduct, inept lawyers and human rights [sic] commissions fail to do so, and their Judges are impediment to enforcement of local laws that implement their obligations to international treaties. 14. Former magistrate avoids jail over sexual abuse of teenagers http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-19/former-magistrate-avoids-jail-over-sexual-abuse-of-teenage-boys/5102610 Protection of their pedophile and corrupt mates, letting them loose on unsuspecting public. There is NO no rhyme or reason or any of their decisions, ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS. 15. This amounts to Protection Racketeering; if we were to present more deaths in custody, we would be here for years!! 16. There is NO one to speak for ethnic immigrants in Australia; they came to seek new life, but Hopes for new life end in pain and premature death; and the Inept High Court Australia is refusing to declare what Laws is VALID; the High Court Australia is setting them up to fail, and in their so doing, calling them INFERIOR. 17. We seek an urgent intervention from the Special Rapporteurs, ICC and Human Rights Council. With Respect, Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung robbiethorpe@gmail.com http://treatyrepublic.net/ SIGNATURE Le Tuan Pham nwn.webmaster@gmail.com http://judicialcorruptionaustralia.tk SIGNATURE The Ethics Office promotes an ethical organizational culture based on our shared values of integrity, accountability, transparency and respect. We are: Independent from management and all other UN offices. Impartial in how we treat individuals. Confidential with information that is entrusted to us. Professional in our dealings with our stakeholders. The Ethics Office was established in 2006 to secure the highest standards of integrity of staff members in accordance with Article 101, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations, taking into consideration paragraph 161 of the2005 World Summit Outcome and pursuant to General Assembly resolution 60/248. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba Permanent Mission to UN Address: 315 Lexington Ave, New York, N.Y. 10016 Telephone: (212) 689 7216 Fax: (212) 689 9073 E-mail: cuba_onu@cubanmission.com Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the UN Address: 350 East 35th Street, Manhattan, New York, NY 10016, USA http://www.china-un.org/eng/ Email：chinamission_un@mfa.gov.cn Mission Directorate, 335 East 46th Street, New York, New York 10017 Phone: (212) 557-2055 Central(212) 557-3528 fax Email misionvene@venezuelaonu.gob.ve Permanent Mission of Ecuador to the United Nations 866 United Nations Plaza, Room 516, New York, N.Y. 10017 Telephone: (212) 935-1680, -1681 Telefax: (212) 935-1835 e-mail: missionecuador@nyct.net Corrupt Racist Australian Judiciary, NO Oath of Office Shocking video shows Gong Ling Tang left to die outside police station

DESTROYING DOCUMENTS IS ILLEGAL - CRIMES ACT 1914 (CTH)

Subject: Crimes act - relating to the Destruction of Loan Application Documents References to the Destroying of Documents : i.e: Loan Application Documents, taken from the CRIMES ACT 1914 - SECT 39.2nd July 2013. The Detective from the Criminal Investigations Branch investigating our Formal complaint of fraud has executed warrants on The CBA, formally requesting ALL of the documents, including the ORIGINAL / WET INK Loan Application Documents. After ignoring the detective's initial requests - for over 8 months, the CBA have finally responded to the detectives formal requests for the ORIGINAL Loan Application documents by telling him that : " The CBA have destroyed the ORIGINAL Documents! " Commonwealth Consolidated Acts CRIMES ACT 1914 - SECT 39 Destroying evidence (1)A person commits an offence if: (a)the person knows that a book, document or thing of any kind is, or may be, required in evidence in a judicial proceeding; and (b)the person: (i) destroys the book, document or thing; or (ii) renders the book, document or thing illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification; and (c) the person does so with the intention of preventing the book, document or thing from being used in evidence; and (d) the judicial proceeding is a federal judicial proceeding. Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years. 2) Absolute liability applies to the paragraph (1)(d) element of the offence. Note: For absolute liability, see section 6.2 of the Criminal Code . CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 286 Obligation to keep financial records (1) A company, registered scheme or disclosing entity must keep written financial records that: (a) correctly record and explain its transactions and financial position and performance; and (b) would enable true and fair financial statements to be prepared and audited. the obligation to keep financial records of transactions extends to transactions undertaken as trustee. Note: Section 9 defines financial records . Period for which records must be retained (2) The financial records must be retained for 7 years after the transactions covered by the records are completed. Strict liability offences 3) An offence based on subsection (1) or (2) is an offence of strict liability. Note: For strict liability , see section 6.1 of the Criminal Code . Record-keeping requirements Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 5.3 The Acts Interpretation Act 1901, which applies to all Commonwealth legislation, provides the following definitions which are applicable to the relevant record-keeping terms in the AML/CTF Act: document includes: (a) any paper or other material on which there is writing; (b) any paper or other material on which there are marks, figures, symbols or perforations having a meaning for persons qualified to interpret them; and (c) any article or material from which sounds, images or writings are capable of being reproduced with or without the aid of any other article or device. record includes information stored or recorded by means of a computer. writing includes any mode of representing or reproducing words, figures, drawings or symbols in a visible form. 6 Retention periods for records 6.3 Records of customer identification procedures are kept for the life of the customer relationship and an additional seven years after the reporting entity ceases to provide any designated services to the customer.