LETTER TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SAT REQUESTING FOR THE VR87OF2009 DECISION TO BE PUT OFF UNTIL ALL DISPUTES WITH LPCC ARE FINIALIZED

Nicholas Ni Kok Chin - LL.B.; B.Econs.(Business & Accountancy), Post. Grad. Dip (Business Law)

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Mr C L Zelestis, QC Chairperson and Law Complaints Officer: Ms D Howell    

Phone: (08) 9461 2299 Fax: (08) 9461 2265 Email: lpcc@lpbwa.com    

2nd Floor Colonial Building, 55 St George's Terrace, PERTH WA 6000    

Office Box Z5293, St George's Terrace, PERTH WA 6831

Atten: Ms. Le Miere

 

His Honour Judge Timothy Sharp

Deputy President of State Administrative Tribunal
Ground Floor 12 St Georges Terrace Perth GPO Box U1991, Perth 6845
Ph: (08) 9219 3111; Fax:(08) 9325 5099

Attention: Associate of Judge Sharp: Candice           BY FACSIMILE

Dear Sirs

VR 87 OF 2009: LPB V CHIN – EXTENDED TIME FOR DELIVERY OF REASONS FOR DECISION ON 23.4.2012  

I refer to the letter from the Chief Executive Officer of SAT dated 21.3.2012 regarding the above.   I would like to update His Honour Judge Timothy Sharp and respond to SAT’s letter as indicated above, as follows:

1)             It is my understanding that the judgment of the above matter has not been delivered yet but the tenor of your letters seems to indicate that a judgment has already been delivered and there remains only the reason for the judgment that needs to be delivered on the 23.4.2012.  Please confirm if this is my correct understanding?

2)             There is a pending joint Application of Maurice Law and myself for Judicial Review in CIV 1275 of 2012 regarding the David Taylor Falsifications of Court Records in CIV1131 of 2006 that is scheduled for hearing before the Supreme Court on 18.6.2012 at 10.30 am.  This David Taylor issue is one of the four issues before His Honour Judge Sharp in VR87 of 2012 and is not yet finalized.  

3)             As a result of Maurice Law Application to SAT in VR158 of 2011 and the Subpoena issued by him to David Taylor resulting in the learned President Chaney of SAT issuing an Order dated 15.11.2011 to David Taylor that he presented to SAT the bank statement attesting to the fact that he paid the filing fees for CIV1131 of 2006 between the dates of 10.2.2006 and 16.2.2006.  The outcome is that David Taylor did on 29.11.2011 file the required bank statement dated 19.5.2009 indicating that the court fees for CIV1131 of 2006 was paid into court and withdrawn on the same for the purpose of inducing Registrar Powell to issue the false Invoice of the Supreme Court bearing No. 202483 with a false date of 16.2.2006 together with the false receipt bearing No. SCR 1442 (The Subpoenaed Bank Statement).

4)             The Subpoenaed Bank Statement was promised by the learned President in the transcript of the proceedings dated 15.11.2011 to be given a copy thereof to Maurice Law when he viewed it with the courtesy of Jacqui of SAT on 30.11.2011.  Since that date, SAT had refused to provide that Subpoenaed Bank Statement to Maurice Law but on 17.2.1012, Maurice was provided a seven-page document detailing the same issues without the Subpoenaed Bank Statement.  This matter is now the separate Application of Maurice Law for Judicial Review in CIV1397 of 2012.   There is no date fixed yet for this Application by Maurice Law to settle this David Taylor issue.

5)             The Timothy Tobin Thies matter is now the subject of my Application for Judicial Review in CIV3427 of 2011 that is scheduled for hearing on 26.6.2012 at 10.30 am.  This is the Thies Issue which forms the second matter that is before Judge Sharp in VR87 of 2009 that has not been finalized.

6)             My Application for Judicial Review in CIV 1323 of 2012 against the decision of His Honour Justice Murray in CIV 1689 of 2011 declaring me a Vexatious Litigant is also scheduled for hearing on 18.6.2012 at 10.30 am.  This is the Legal Practice Board Issue which forms the third subject matter that is before Judge Sharp that has not been finalized.

In view of the three matters as enumerated and described in items 2, 4, 5 and 6 of paragraph 1 above, NOT BEING FINALIZED by the

time scheduled time of the EXPECTED DELIVERY of the decision of SAT in VR87 of 2009 on 23.4.2012, I would therefore request 

for it to be PUT OFF to a later date, otherwise, that decision is going to be an INCHOATE DECISION.

Yours faithfully

NICHOLAS N CHIN 

Office: 387 Alexander Drive, DIANELLA WA   6059, AUSTRALIA. Contact:  ph: +6189275 7440; fax: +618 92757440; mobile:

0421642735; emails: nnchin1@gmail.com; nnchin@msn.com; Skype: nicholasnchin2885