Hi Nicholas,
I was just now reading about your situation in the e-mail from "Democracy Defined".
I'm not a lawyer, however have been representing myself for four years now in the Supreme Court of Brisbane, against foreclosure.
What I have discovered through my research is that no Government in Australia, since 1919 has had any authority to even exist, let alone make, amend or repeal laws. This of course includes the courts, therefore any judgments made has no legal effect.
I have attached an essay from Sir Harry Gibbs, ex Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, who concludes THE EXISTANCE OF GOVERNMENT IN AUSTRALIA HAS NO BASIS IN LAW.
He refers to the so called constitutional crisis, which has existed since Australia achieved independance following the Treaty of Vesailles in 1919 following the second World War. Every Government since, has been no doubt aware of the problem, but not addressed it, and carried on with no legal authority.
The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution UK 1900 (an Act of the British parliament), formed the basis and foundation of our legal system, government etc, however ceased to be relevant following independance because it became an Act of a foreign government. Hence all figures of authority since have contiued to swear allegiance to a foreign power (the Queen).
Further evidence of this is the fact that no Governor General since, had been sworn in by the Queen, yet it remains the role of the Governor General to swear in Prime Ministers, Judges, Justices, State Governors etc. - this means these appointments are null and void.
To add to the Constitutional mess, you may be aware the Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Government, every state and state Government, including all subsidiaries are in fact Corporations masqerading as government, which gives them absolutely no authority whatsoever without consent arising from full disclosure.
I myself have sent letters to alleged Supreme Court Judges, the alleged Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the alleged State Attorney General, to validate their authority, but of course they can not, so ignore my requests.
We are constantly required to provide identification, but when we request it, they ignore us. That is because they are not obliged to as members of private corporations.
But of course the same goes for us. WE HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO ABIDE BY THE RULES OF A CORPORATION THAT WE ARE NOT EMPLOYED BY, NOR HAVE A VALID AND BINDING CONTRACT WITH.
Hope this helps
Regards
Garry moon
THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLE OF A DEMOCRATIC AUSTRALIA HAS THE LAST WORD ON WHAT SORT OF JUDICIARY IT HAS TO CONTEND WITH. IT MUST BE A JUDICIARY THAT EXERCISE ITS POWERS WITH INTEGRITY. MR. GARY MOON REPRESENTS THE COMMON PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA WHO ARE THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA.
ReplyDelete