COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA IS A CORPORATION

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA IS A CORPORATION.
.
What follows is the complete explanation of the contempt by all Political Parties of the;
Australian Constitution Chapter One, Part IV. -- Both Houses of the Parliament.
Section 44 and Section 46;

Item (9).
     44. Any person who--
          (i. ) Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power:

        (v. ) Has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons:

shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting, as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.

     46. Until the Parliament otherwise provides, any person declared by this Constitution to be incapable of sitting as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives shall, for every day on which he so sits, be liable to pay the sum of one hundred pounds to any person who sues for it in any court of competent jurisdiction.
.
All political Parties and the United Nations are Non Government Organisations and as such would be the opposite to Section 44. (i. ) are under acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power by sending armed forces to Afghanistan and Iraq and;

What right has the Prime Minister to replace the Governor-General as the command in chief of the naval and military forces of the Commonwealth that is vested in the Governor-General as the Queen's representative. Chapter 2.  Section 68?

Section 44. (v. ) in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more
than twenty-five persons;

The Parliament of Australia has more than 150 persons.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Corporation) registered in the
UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION as CIK (0000805157).

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
CIK (0000805157)
SIC: 8880 - American Depositary Receipts
State location: DC | Fiscal Year End: 0630

Business Address
1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW
C/O AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY
WASHINGTON DC 20036 

NOTE; This is not the Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, which is of one Electorate.
And there is no provision in the Constitution for any political parties.
The above Commonwealth of Australia Corporation was formed by the Political Parties.
Under the Crimes Act 1914 Part 2 Section 24AA. Sabotaging the Constitution is treachery.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Links to proof of information.
http://sec.gov/
http://sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_bilateral/australia.pdf
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/805157/000134100410002039/0001341004-10-002039-index.htm

.
Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia
There is much trickery in the word usage itself.

A "Sovereign Nation" for instance really means a "nation-state" or "a corporate entity with sovereign powers" such as the two entities COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [SEC filing in Washington DC in 1934 already].

From what I can gather it appears that the original system of the Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia [lasted only for a relatively short time period between 1900-1919, perhaps in original form] is still in existence to this very day, but laying largely dormant.

Then came the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION at least as early as 1929 if not before, which has a SEC filing in Washington D.C. filed as early as 1934, a few years after the 1929 bankruptcy.
With it's PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH all of these, other than the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, are what you call SOVEREIGN NATIONS which really means "Corporate or Nation-States with Sovereign Power i.e. operating in their own right as properly established corporations with the power to make rules for their corporation and those who are members of their corporations i.e. AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS.

It appears that Queen Elizabeth the Second [the true original Monarch] cannot not assent to legislation for the corporations known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA but her original Constitutional system is still in existence albeit laying dorment due to the fact that we are not operating according to the law in our financial affairs [i.e. we are NOT using Constitutional money of substance, the most critically important but least known or mentioned "condition" of the original Constitution] and due to the now non-existence of Constitutionally-approved money of substance as per the terms and conditions of original Constitution which in any case, was nothing more than a debt-repayment contract for debts of the country accrued between 1850-1900].

Put in another way, the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, under the Constitution is now a foreign entity to the corporations/nation-state/SOVEREIGN NATIONS known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA which belong to and essentially established by the IMF/UNITED NATIONS.

Therefore in our current PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH one cannot swear allegiance to a foreign entity - that is, the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, under the Constitution hereby established that is now an entity foreign to that corporation known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, with a fictional "QUEEN OF AUSTRALIA" which is just a fictional title [no flesh and blood entity behind it].

So in reality the Constitutional protections and true protection of the law lay in one claiming to be a member of the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia whereby Queen Elizabeth the Second [the living flesh and blood monarch] still reigns albeit not currently operating or controlling the current "public offices" in any fiscal sense of the word, however, the original Constitutional protections and guaranteed rights under the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia are still in operation and still exist for they can only be removed by a referendum of, for and by the people.

"AUSTALIAN CITIZENS" are "corporate fictional persons" with no Constitutional rights as guaranteed in the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia and only have benefits and priveleges and a corporate charter known as the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 - the real living flesh and blood people, of which you could count on one hand, still have the full protection and rights as guaranteed in the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia which still exists but is laying dormant in any operational sense.

To sum it up, Queen Elizabeth the Second, the true flesh and blood living Monarch, is still the executive power of the Commonwealth that is vested in the Queen of the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, a venue and jurisdiction which although is still in existence for those who wish to protect and claim their lawful rights, is dormant in any controlling or financially operational sense when it comes to public offices. Such rights can only be involked "administratively" [private venue and jurisdiction]. AS soon as there is any controversy in any court cases today for instance, the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is granted jurisdiction automatically to hear and adjudicate with absolute discretion in relation to such "controversy".

Over the top of the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia, came two successive CORPORATIONS known as NATION-STATES or SOVEREIGN NATIONS [a Nation is NOT a country so to speak] which belong to the UN and IMF and were lawfully imposed over the top of the Original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia due to the bankruptcy/receivership of the Original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia in 1929 with rearrangments and reconstructions of the debt repayment terms and conditions resulting in the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 which is a CORPORATE CHARTER for the SOVEREIGN NATION [Corporate Nation-State] of AUSTRALIA.

In consideration of the fact that virtually ALL of the Constitutional entities in ALL of the western/Christian countries were bankrupted or went into receivership at the same time in 1929, it is also therefore possible that the STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER itself is nothing more than a corporate mirror-image, rather than an actual IMPERIAL act of British Parliament.

The term "AUSTRALIA" when used by the courts does not refer to the land mass country known as Australia but to the CORPORATION the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA established around 1929 unless specifically or impliedly stated otherwise. The AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 is the CORPORATE CHARTER for the corporation known as AUSTRALIA and AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS are PERSONS of which the Creator has no respect for, who only have benefits and priveleges and no Constitutional rights - this unfortunately is the absolute majority of the population.

So there appears to have taken place the following since 1900:

1. The Original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia with Queen Elizabeth the Second, living flesh and blood reigning Monarch.

2. The Corporation known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA with a SEC filing in Washington DC filed in 1934. [A SOVEREIGN NATION WHICH DOES NOT MEAN A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY - it means a corporation or nation state with Sovereign power - eg, established by the creditor to whom the debts of the original Commonwealth of Australia were owed to - the IMF/UN/CROWN/International banksters ].

3. The Corporation known as AUSTRALIA established and incorporated in 1973 as a result of a secondary level of debt reconstruction and reorganization bringing with it subsidiary corporations such as PARLIAMENT OF AUSTRALIA and QUEEN OF AUSTRALIA and finally THE AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 [ the main Corporate charter].

Underlying the above numbers 2 and 3 is still in existence the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia and it's Constitution, with the original living flesh and blood Queen Elizabeth the Second as reigning Monarch to this very day which still protects those who choose not to be AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS, [members of the CORPORATION/SOVEREIGN NATION-STATE] those who recognize there is no money of substance in circulation anymore, and those who wish to access their exemption/prepaid account to discharge/setoff their debts in recognition of the fact that the funny money in circulation today cannot lawfully do so.

The actual protections of the law lie in the recognition of either and/or both:

1. That the living flesh and blood Queen Elizabeth the second is still our reigning Monarch for those who are NOT AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS with full Constitutional guarantees for those who wish to stand upon and claim such

2. The you are not an AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN PERSON fictional legal entity with only benefits and priveleges who must obey the corporate charter [AUSTRALIA ACT 1986] of the corporation known as AUSTRALIA.

Put another way the situation in Australia the land mass is as follows:

Private Venue and jurisdiction: The original Constitutional Commonwealth of Australia is still in full force and effect with Queen Elizabeth the Second still reigning over it, guaranteeing all rights to those who do not wish to be AUSTRALIAN CITIZEN PERSONS and make a cliam upon/use their exemption/prepaid account status. There is however no Constitutional money of substance to run the public offices in such a manner as originally intended but the protections of the law contained within the original Constitution nevetheless still exist.

Public Venue and Jurisiction: The IMF established and incorporated a corporation known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [with a SEC Filing in Washington DC in 1934] at the bankruptcy/receivership of the original Constitutional Commonwealth of Austraia. AUSTRALIA was established and incorporated in 1973 as a secondary level consequence and reorganization of the 1929 bankruptcy whereby, AUSTRALIAN CITIZENS being PERSONS who are members of the CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA with their CORPORATE CHARTER being the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 who have only benefits and priveleges granted to them by the PARLIAMENT OF AUSTRALIA of which the living flesh and blood Queen Elizabeth the Second is now a foreign entity offering no Constitutional protections to such PERSONS.

The trickery has been in the use of words which resembled closely our original institutions, which such original institutions were replaced with corporations created, established and incorporated by the International Monetary Fund and it's many subsidiaries such as the CROWN, the UN, with the Vatican City ultimately controlling all of the above.
.
My Question of ACN; Is this the reason for the introduction of GST taxation system?
The banking ombudsman is really a series of interloping inter meddling interfering impostors (agents)
corporations;
ACN 050 070 034 REGD * THE AUSTRALIAN BANKING INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN LTD
ACN 050 070 034 REGD BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN LIMITED
ACN 114 322 468 REGD FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE PTY LTD
ACN 006 354 089 REGD BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES LAW ASSOCIATION LTD.

ACN 104 961 882 104 961 882 FREE  end_of_the_skype_highlighting REGD * MORTGAGE INDUSTRY OMBUDSMAN SERVICE LIMITED
ACN 104 961 882 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 104 961 882 FREE  end_of_the_skype_highlighting REGD CREDIT OMBUDSMAN SERVICE LIMITED
ACN 117 680 172 REGD INDEPENDENT OMBUDSMAN SERVICE PTY LTD
NSW D0810222 RMVD MR OMBUDSMAN
059240130 NRGD OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN

and are another useless piece of bureaucratic deception in supposedly helping REAL flesh & blood human beings. They are their to deal with FICTIONS (corporations - your strawman) such as FRANCES SMALLBONE but not Frances Smallbone who is the real flesh & blood human being.

The internationalised banksters (globalised corporation) controls the commonwealth (corporate) government of Australia and this corporation controls all federal, state & local government depts. & public servants (all corporations) and the law (another series of corporations).

In a case like ours the real human being ombudsman (a legal FICTION) contracted to the corporation within a myriad series of corporations is completely out of his/her REAL depth and if he/she tried anything REAL outside their corporate jurisdiction (FICTION), you can kiss good bye to their career and long term security etc.

Corporations are the internationalised shadow government who have usurped all sovereign constitutional enactment's & systems through their statutes.
.
Magna Carta, The Bill Of Rights etc. are abolished.
We no longer have legal rights and the judges know & enforce this!
.



 

We are now governed by CORPORATION STATUTES. Did we have a referendum to allow this? or were we all tricked and deceived? This is why trial by jury is almost completely wiped out. Common Law is literally kaput.

Something I noticed today for the very first time was near the very bottom of the Daily court lists for the Supreme Court of NSW. I have cut & pasted this here (see color blue)
.

D U T Y     R O S T E R

COMMON LAW DUTY JUDGE JUSTICE HISLOP   COURT 9D
COMMON LAW LIST JUDGE JUSTICE HALL COURT 11C
COMMON LAW DUTY ASSOCIATE JUDGE ASSOCIATE JUSTICE MALPASS COURT 10B

EQUITY DUTY JUDGE JUSTICE CAMPBELL COURT  8B
(Includes urgent Admiralty List applications)

COMMERCIAL LIST DUTY JUDGE JUSTICE BERGIN COURT 10C
(all Commercial List and Technology & Construction List urgent matters)

CORPORATION JUDGE JUSTICE WHITE COURT 12B

EQUITY DUTY ASSOCIATE JUDGE ASSOCIATE JUSTICE MACREADY COURT 7B

Practitioners wishing to contact a Duty Judge after hours should contact the
Law Courts Security Desk on 9230 8025.

******

.
You see, the arrogance of these illumined persons is now revealing out in the open what has been suspected and or known by many freedom committers from around the world for many years now, that all our courts are now under Admiralty (Maritime) Law, (corporation law governed by corporation statutes).

Did you know that the English Alphabet appears to have been created by Illumined French Legals and is sort of copyrighted & patented. Each letter means something that only the initiated Illumined ones know and when you bring the individual letters together to form words they have various other meanings as well.

Where we (unillumined) are trained (conditioned-brainwashed) to know the meanings of various words in the English language (they all have double or triple or quadruple meanings etc), we are not trained to know the REAL meanings of each letter of the English alphabet and how each letter forms (singular or combined) a REAL (another) meaning/s of each word.                                                                                                                                                                          This is how these EVIL persons have been controlling humanity like cattle for centuries. The REAL power of the ENGLISH LANGUAGE is in how it is REALLY being used against us to control us. How we think & what we say in English etc is what IMPRISONS us as slaves and this is how we give our power away to the ILLUMINED ones who see themselves as our masters.

The bastardised ENGLISH language was created to ENSLAVE us. Everywhere where the English language has blossomed on Earth, you see psychic ENSLAVEMENT by those who read, write & talk English and its all done with mental (psychic) cells/prisons.

Yes....Double-Triple-Quadruple Speak does exist and I intend on passing on the knowledge I am currently gathering so anyone can INTERPRET the REAL language being spoken by our various ILLUMINED politicians, media reps etc etc and how to UNTANGLE ourselves from the psychic webs we create for ourselves, that entrap us. More on all this down the line.

*************

.
.

We will control the Goyim (people) with numbers and paper.
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

As in Spirit So on the Earth, The Illumined Ones will always break the circle of life so that souls are made to feel isolated and disconnected from the circle of life, on every level of life, within themselves, within family, within community, within society, within nature and within God. Wherever there is a fracture to the circle of life, it is Chaos (FICTION) that maintains the fracture and this can now also be seen (witnessed) with the ASIC register. With a play on words, numbers and a series of cleverly placed disconnected abbreviations intentions, just like a maze, most human beings, at first or even second glance, would not have noticed what is REALLY being stated, what is REALLY going on within the ASIC register.

In discussions with our support group this is how the ASIC NRGD scenario now appears.

We realised that WE HAD TO join up various disconnected, unrelated abbreviations, like a jigsaw puzzle, to provide us with our current conclusions. We are not saying that we are 100% right with our current conclusions, because we can't, until much more research has been done. However, for now, here are our ASIC conclusions and they are most intriguing.

Of all the ASIC Abbreviations, there are THREE that REALLY stand out for now.

ASIC says NRGD means - Not-Registered  - Status for a non company

ASIC says NONC means - Non company - An organisation recorded in our corporate database, usually because it has a reportable role within a registered company, but which is not itself known to be registered with ASIC or any of the State Departments of Fair Trading.

ASIC says NRET means - Non-registered entity - An organisation that is not required to be registered with ASIC but whose name appears on our database because, under the terms of its incorporation, the organisation is required to lodge certain documents with ASIC, (usually annual returns or annual financial statements).

When you read the three together.....NRGD - Status for a non company. An organisation recorded in our corporate database, usually because it has a reportable role within a registered company, but which is not itself known to be registered with ASIC or any of the State Departments of Fair Trading. An organisation that is not required to be registered with ASIC but whose name appears on our database because, under the terms of its incorporation, the organisation is required to lodge certain documents with ASIC, (usually annual returns or annual financial statements).

What we suspect is being stated here is NRGD represents thousands of INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS operating in Australia, WHO are linked to and are sitting underneath the INTERNATIONALISED CORPORATION umbrella known as COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA registered in the UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION as 0000805157. See the website

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
CIK (0000805157)
SIC: 8880 - American Depositary Receipts
State location: DC | Fiscal Year End: 0630

Business Address
1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW
C/O AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY
WASHINGTON DC 20036
.

ASIC

ASIC thinks it is running under our Australian Government and is part of our Australian Government system, part of our supposed Australian Constitution, and this is why ASIC does not recognise THE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONS who operate IN AND OUT OF Australia. Like a Russian Doll with pyramids within pyramids,
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION sits underneath a series of even bigger CORPORATIONS and COLLECTIVELY they take the form known as THE NEW WORLD ORDER. So what we have are thousands of CORPORATIONS, PERSONS (FICTIONS) both big or small, working in Australia to support THE NEW WORLD ORDER.

To export all Australia's wealth out of Australia, through the interweaving networks of INTERNATIONALISED FICTIONAL CORPORATIONS, which service the FICTIONAL DEBTS OWING TO THE FICTIONAL INTERNATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION/S. CORPORATIONS who sit above the INTERNATIONALISED CORPORATION KNOWN AS COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 0000805157.

Innocent until proven guilty, it appears we have thousands of REAL Australian flesh and blood human beings working and living amongst us as TRAITORS. The freedom fighting movement has them as well.

These TRAITORS are part of a FICTIONALISED network of very well organised and interconnecting soldier ants and white ant colonies (CORPORATIONS). Ants of all types who are knowingly or unknowingly supporting the rape and pillage of ALL of Australia's resources while making slaves and robots out of all the freemen and freewomen of Australia (interest rates, tariffs, penalties, statute-corporation laws, fines, rates, debts, charges, sell-offs of Aussie assets etc etc).
They treat us with scorn. They laugh at us. They hate us. We are the GOYIM to these fanatical Luciferic-Satanic Psychos.

If we are right about the NRGD listings then we can QUICKLY target these INTERNATIONALISED traitors through ASIC. What is most important is now getting many freedom fighters to now urgently download every NRGD listing before ASIC blocks access to these NRGD records. We need to quickly get organised and start researching and documenting all the links between each and every INTERNATIONALISED CORPORATION operating under stealth in Australia. For starters, I am asking for researchers to help us with our court case. To help us finally have the information and the evidence that will have the;

CORPORATION JUSTICE PETER JOHN HIDDEN
CORPORATION SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORPORATION THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORPORATION COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
CORPORATION BARRISTER STEVEN MARK GOLLEDGE
CORPORATION NSW BAR ASSOCIATION
CORPORATION AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION
CORPORATION DIBBS ABBOTT STILLMAN LAWYERS
CORPORATION PERPETUAL LIMITED
CORPORATION MACQUARIE MORTGAGES PTY LTD
CORPORATION MACQUARIE BANK;

that will self implode, as we pull hard at the strings that tie them all together as an INTERNATIONALISED COLLECTIVE.
We have the opportunity through our court case to create a PRECEDENT that will open the floodgates for all Australians. Please help us to help you and every REAL Australian. This is not a statement of FICTION.
.
This is a REAL calling by REAL Australians who are committed to the bigger picture of living with a REAL LIVING GOD who created our REAL lives.

All NRGD listings do not and I say it again DO NOT report to anyone in Australia. What ASIC says " the organisation is required to lodge certain documents with ASIC, (usually annual returns or annual financial statements)." is not the Truth.

We may not be wrong in stating that NRGD really means NON REPORTING GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT. (Government over us)
.
So we have two types of Corporations, one that benefits only the Illumined Ones and the other they control through statutes. One that the freemen and freewomen of Australia gets abused by without realising it and the other that keeps them in fantasy so they can continue being abused. Think about it!
.
My Question of NRGD; Is this the reason for the introduction of GST taxation system?

122104616 NRGD COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

066561153 NRGD THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES

054558619 NRGD THE STATE OF VICTORIA

066102930 NRGD STATE OF QUEENSLAND
106876500 NRGD STATE OF QUEENSLAND
109140696 NRGD STATE OF QUEENSLAND
115918931 NRGD STATE OF QUEENSLAND
051862278 NRGD THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
113461699 NRGD THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
058021015 NRGD STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT)
098053519 NRGD STATE OF QUEENSLAND
(QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE - CENTRAL REGION)

050208921 NRGD STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

072526008 NRGD THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

053201308 NRGD STATE OF TASMANIA

090598548 NRGD TRUSTEES OF NORTHERN TERRITORY GOVERNMENT

082542872 NRGD WOOLLAHRA MUNCIPAL COUNCIL

061585117 NRGD WAVERLEY COUNCIL

053117454 NRGD WAVERLEY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

052079839 NRGD SYDNEY CITY COUNCIL
054489753 NRGD SYDNEY CITY COUNCIL
054439548 NRGD SYDNEY CITY COUNCIL
054462261 NRGD SYDNEY CITY COUNCIL

051186353 NRGD SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
059818950 NRGD THE PROTHONOTORY, SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
(Prothonotary; The college constituted by the twelve apostolical prothonotaries of Rome.)
.
115636336 NRGD THE SENIOR MASTER OF THE SUPREME COURT
054624010 NRGD SUPREME COURT OFFICE
103105693 NRGD SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
054997438 NRGD SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA
089862144 NRGD SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA

121267703 NRGD DIBBS ABBOTT STILLMAN LAWYERS

ASIC listing for Steven Mark Golledge - 062061885 NRGD S M GOLLEDGE

098774719 NRGD PERPETUAL
086803116 NRGD PERPETUAL TRUSTEES OF QLD
098006690 NRGD PERPETUAL ATF FLEXIPLAN AUSTRALIA MASTER
095152408 NRGD PERPETUAL ATF HEINE MORTGAGE TRUST
095152373 NRGD PERPETUAL ATF HEINE PROPERTY SECURITIES FUND
050725669 NRGD PERPETUAL TRUSTEES FOR LATE PETER RANDALL

121083145 NRGD MACQAURIE BANK LTD
111186559 NRGD MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED
113749492 NRGD MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED
103049743 NRGD MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED A/C DE SOUZA
108298595 NRGD MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED - GENERATOR AUSTRALIA #1 TRUST
113796375 NRGD MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED METALS AND MINING DIVISION
119179752 NRGD MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED METALS & ENERGY CAPITAL DIV
106820491 NRGD VYTEL INVESTMENTS PTY LTD AND MACQUARIE BANK LIMIT ED
118542911 NRGD MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED (METALS AND MINING DIVN A/C )
118995752 NRGD MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED
(METALS & ENERGY CAPITAL DI VISION)
054921390 NRGD MACQUARIE
054921425 NRGD MACQUARIE
065360554 NRGD MACQUARIE ASSOCIATES
.
Yes this information can be backed up and this is the reason for the GST.

********************

These are listed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission;
 TELSTRA CORP LTD (0001046126)
SIC: 4813 - Telephone Communications (No Radiotelephone)
State location: C3 | State of Inc.: C3 | Fiscal Year End: 0630 Business Address ;
242 EXHIBITION ST LEVEL 242
MELBOURNE
VICTORIA AUSTRALIA C3 3183
6139631111
 Mailing Address
242 EXHIBITION ST LEVEL 242
MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3183
AUSTRALIA C3 00000
 ***

WMC OLYMPIC DAM CORP PTY LTD (0001239398)
State location: C3
Business Address ;
LEVEL 16 IBM CENTRE
60 CITY ROAD
MELBOURNE C3 00000
610396856275
 ***

 

 

PACKER KERRY F B (0000941606)
State location: C3 | State of Inc.: NY | Fiscal Year End: 1231
Business Address
54-58 PARK ST
SYDNEY C3 00000
 Mailing Address ;
54-58 PARK ST
SYDNEY C3 00000
 ***

 PATRICK CORP LTD (0001340726)
State location: C3
Business Address ;
LEVEL 1, 102 YORK STREET
SOUTH MELBOURNE C3 00000
 Mailing Address
LEVEL 1, 102 YORK STREET
SOUTH MELBOURNE C3 00000
 ***

INDONESIAN YEAST CO PTY LTD (0001180284)
SIC: 2090 - Miscellaneous Food Preparations & Kindred Products
State location: C3
Business Address ;
LEVEL 2
44 MARTIN PL
SYDNEY NSW C3 2000
01161292279333
 Mailing Address
GPO BOX 543
SYDNEY NSW C3 2001
 ***

 TREASURY CORP OF VICTORIA (0000898608)
SIC: 8888 - Foreign Governments
State location: C3 | Fiscal Year End: 0630 Business Address ;
1 COLLINS STREET
MELBOURNE VICTORIA
AUSTRALIA C3 00000
61396514800
 ***

 ST GEORGE BANK LTD /FI (0000926497)
State location: C3 Business Address ;
4-16 MONTGOMERY ST
AUSTRALIA C3 2217
***

 

 

 

 

 STATE OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA (0001244818)
State location: C3 Business Address ;
C/O QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORP
GPO BOX 1096
BRISBAINE QUEENSLAND C3 4001
01161738424600
 Mailing Address
C/O QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORP
GPO BOX 1096
BRISBAINE QUEENSLAND C3 4001
***

QUEENSLAND TREASURY CORP (0000852555)
SIC: 8888 - Foreign Governments
State location: C3 Business Address ;
LEVEL 14 61 MARY STREET
GPO BOX 1096
BRISBANE QUEENSLAND C3 4001
61738424600
 ***

NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD (0000833029)
SIC: 6021 - National Commercial Banks
State location: C3 | State of Inc.: NY | Fiscal Year End: 0930                                                                                           Business Address ;
P O BOX 2333V
MELBOURNE VIC AUSTRA C3 30001
610386410296
 Mailing Address
P O BO 2333V
MELBOURNE VIC AUSTRA C3 3001
 ***

 MACQUARIE BANK LTD (0001257135)
State location: C3                                                                                                                                                                Business Address
LEVEL 9 15 LONDON CIRCUIT
CANBERRA ACT 2600 C3 00000
 ***

 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (0000008565)
SIC: 6029 - Commercial Banks, NEC
State location: C3 | Fiscal Year End: 0630                                                                                                                  Business Address
48 MARTIN PLACE
SYDNEY N S W 2000 AU C3
6129378332
 Mailing Address
1114 AVE OF THE AMERICAS
C/O THOMAS J RICE COUDERT BROS
NEW YORK NY 10036
 ***

 

AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD (0000859994)
SIC: 6029 - Commercial Banks, NEC
State location: C3 | Fiscal Year End: 0930 Business Address ;
LEVEL 6, 100 QUEEN STREET
MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA
MELBOURNE C3 3000
 ***
.
 These are listed with the ASIC;
 097608243 NRGD CITY OF GREATER DANDENONG
 071639168 NRGD CITY OF GREATER GEELONG
 076486685 NRGD CITY OF GREATER BENDIGO
***

 107975137 NRGD WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL
This is the Gippsland area of Victoria.
***

 VIC P310822 PEND U3A HEPBURN SHIRE INC.
 VIC B1969531W REGD SARGEANTS - BALLARAT CITY AND HEPBURN SHIRE
 VIC B1774503L REGD HEPBURN SHIRE ADVOCATE
 VIC B1956431F RMVD SARGEANTS - HEPBURN SHIRE
***

 054663213 NRGD CITY OF BALLARAT
 065387920 NRGD UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT
 ACN 005 496 935 REGD UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT STUDENT ASSOCIATION LTD
 092213762 NRGD UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT - TAFE DIVISION
 VIC B1557412C REGD UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT INTERNATIONAL
 108878771 NRGD UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT
***
PROTHONOTORY;  the correct spelling is PROTHONOTARY.
A chief notary or clerk; a chief secretary of the chancery at Rome.

 

SIR HARRY GIBBS ON THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS

Sir Harry Gibbs On The Australian Constitutional Crisis

Mon, 02/21/2011 - 22:22 — Arthur Cristian

Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs 1917 to 2005

Copy of Letter from Sir Harry Gibbs

Explanatory Statement

I am a former member of the High Court and I wish to take this unusual method of informing you about a matter that is going to deeply affect us all. Unfortunately, a document such as this is too easily "lost" in the bureaucratic jungle in which we operate.

A group of Australian Citizens have taken it upon themselves to test the validity of our current political and judicial system. Like you, I have lived my entire legal career with the assumption that the basis for our legal and political system, state and federal, was written in stone. This group has undertaken to present this paper when they test the legal system.

The group is articulate, well educated and counts some of our best legal minds amongst its members. One of Australia's best known barristers is one of the group's leading lights. It is far better informed with regard to international law than most members of the judiciary or for that matter, the legal academe. It has better international contacts than I would have thought possible.

After spending some time with the group leader, I was able to elicit its primary intentions. It is the introduction of a totally democratic system of government devoid of party politics operated by the will of the people incorporating a system of debit taxation which should go a long way to eliminating the current unemployment problem and also addressing other pressing social issues. An A.B.S. financial model supports the proposal.

The group has so far concentrated on matters relating to taxation, state and federal, minor industrial and motor traffic while undertaking not to present a criminal defence using their current presentation. I challenged the leader of this group to present any evidence he had with regard to the above defence so I could use my legal expertise to play the part of the devil's advocate. It should be brought to your attention that the group has access to documentation that we members of the judiciary have little knowledge. I refer to the British Parliamentary Papers for the Colony of Australia for the years 1860 through to 1922.

These are photocopies of all documents correspondence etc., between the states and later the Commonwealth of Australia, the British Crown and the British Government. They are very revealing documents and indicate the degree of chicanery in which the politicians of all shades were involved and as I can now see, at the expense of the legal academe and the judiciary. I present for your perusal the details of the group's presentation along with my comment on each major item. The group relies solely upon historical fact and rejects political rhetoric and legal opinion unless based upon historical fact.

1. "The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) is an act of the parliament of the United Kingdom. It did not contain any substance of sovereignty and was a colonial act centralising self-government of the six Australian Colonies. Australia remained a colony of the United Kingdom."

1a. Although the late Lionel Murphy attempted to show that there was an element of sovereignty in this act he failed. The international definition of sovereignty has been espoused at length and the above act although important in the development of Australia, did not have the authority of sovereignty. The historical evidence that Australia remained a British Colony post 1901 is overwhelming.

2. "Australia made an international declaration of its intention to become a sovereign nation when Prime Minister Hughes and his deputy; Sir Joseph Cook signed the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. On its cognisance of signing this treaty, Australia was granted a "C" class League of Nations mandate over former German territories in the Pacific. In effect, Papua New Guinea became a colony of Australia achieving its own independence on 16 September 1975. The League of Nations became part of International Law on 10 January 1920 with Article X of the Covenant of League of Nations guaranteeing the sovereignty of each member,"

2A. The Significance of Australia joining the League of Nations as a foundation member has never been addressed in Australia before.
Strangely, only one book has ever examined the question of Australian independence. Written by W. J. Hudson and M. P. Sharp in 1988 "Australian Independence" printed by Melbourne University Press. As both were members of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade at the time of authorship and had access to the, British Parliamentary Papers, I find it most interesting they have avoided any mention of these papers in their book. Their conclusion that Australia became an independent nation via. the Statute of Westminster in 1931 flies in the face of contradictory evidence within the above mentioned papers and readily available historical fact.

Prime Minister Hughes address to the Commonwealth Parliament on 10 September 1919, "Australia has now entered into a family of nations on a footing of equality. Australia has been born in a blood sacrifice." demonstrates the politicians of the day were only too well aware of the change of status from a colony to that of sovereign nation while attempting to remain within the Empire.

Prime Minister Bruce made this reply to the British Government in 1922 after a request for troops against Kernel Ataturk in the Chanak crisis. Bruce's reply is contained in the British Parliamentary Papers: "We have to try to ensure there shall be an Empire foreign policy which if we are to be in anyway responsible for it, must be one to which we agree and have assented. If we are to take any responsibility for the Empire's foreign policy, there must be a better system, so that we may be consulted and have a better opportunity to express the views of the people of this country. We cannot blindly submit to any policy which may involve us in war." This is a far cry from the declaration of war against Germany made on behalf of the British Colony of Australia by George V of the United Kingdom in 1914.

I have re-produced Bruce's reply in full as I believe this reply contains clear historical evidence of a Prime Minister who was well aware of the change of status from a. colony to a sovereign nation. The later Statute of Westminster 1931 was an acknowledgment of that status.

3. "Paragraph 4 of the Statue of Westminster Act 1931 contravenes Article X of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Paragraph 1 of the Australia Act 1986 contravenes Article 2 paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Charter of the United Nations."

3A Paragraph 4 of the Statute of Westminster reads "No Act of Parliament of the United. Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to a Dominion as part of the law of that Dominion, unless it is expressly declared in that Act that Dominion, has requested, and consented to the enactment thereof." Paragraph 1 of the Australia Act is very similar: "No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to the Commonwealth, to a State or Territory as part of the law of the Commonwealth, of the State or of the Territory."

I passed this one to the Federal Attorney General and asked him what was the source of this quite incredible authority that sought to overturn the authority legislated within the Covenant of the League of Nations in Article X and the Charter of the United Nations in Article 2 paragraphs 1 and 4. He is unable to provide any documentation to support these clauses, Article X of the Covenant of the League of Nations states: "The members of the League undertake to respect and preserve against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence of all Members of the League. In case of any such aggression or in case of any threat or danger of such aggression, the Council shall advise upon the means by which this obligation shall be fulfilled."

It is appropriate that I now introduce a statement by Sir Geoffrey Butler KBE, MA and Fellow, Librarian and Lecturer in International Law and Diplomacy of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge author of "A Handbook to-the League of Nations" used as a reference to the League by virtually all nations at that time. He refers to Article 1 of the Covenant of the League of Nations.

"It is arguable that this article is the Covenant's most significant single measure. By it the British Dominions, namely New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, and Canada, have their independent nationhood established for the first time. There may be friction over small matters in giving effect to this internationally acknowledged fact but the Dominions will always look to the League of Nations Covenant as their Declaration of Independence.

Article 2 paragraph 1 of the United Nation's Charter states "The Organisation is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members."

Article 2 paragraph 4 of the Charter states ‘All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."

In view of the above, the historical evidence for Australian Independence by 10 January 1920 when the League of Nations became part of International Law is overwhelming. When this evidence is reinforced with the contents of the Charter of the United Nations, the continued usage of any legislation that owes its very legitimacy to the parliament of an acknowledged foreign power cannot be supported by either legal opinion or indeed historical evidence.

I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in Australia and its States and Territories has no basis in law.

Following discussions with members of the British Government relating to the Letters Patent for the Governor General and State Governors I find that these documents no longer have any authority. Indeed, the Queen of the United, Kingdom is excluded from any position of power in Australia by the United Nations Charter and is excluded under UK law from the issue of a Letters Patent to other than a British Subject. A Letters Patent must refer to an action to be taken with regard to British Citizens. The Immigration Act. 1972 UK defines Australian Citizen as aliens.

The Governor General's Letters Patent is a comedy of errors. We are greeted in the name of the Queen of Australia who suddenly becomes the Queen of the United Kingdom in the next paragraph I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in Australia and its States and Territories has no basis in law.

of the Letters Patent. This Queen then gives instructions to the Governor General with reference to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK. Here we have a clear breach of Article 2 paragraph 1 of the United Nation Charter. Under both UK and international law, the-Queen is a British Citizen.

State Governors are in a worse position as their authority comes from the late Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom. Regardless of the validity of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK, if the authority of Governor General and the State Governors is invalid then so is the entire political and legal system of government.

When advised that the War Crimes Commission was taking an interest, I called them in Geneva. Under the 1947 Geneva Convention, they are empowered to look into cases here in Australia where it is alleged the law of a foreign country was enforced against a citizen of a member state of the United Nations. As they perceive that only the judiciary can actually enforce the law, the judicary becomes their target. The group has already placed cases before them which they are currently investigating. If found guilty, the penalties are horrific and include the death penalty!

I could go on with more relevant information however I think now is the time for a summary. The group leader, a QC, states the obvious when he asked me how could a colony now acknowledged by all world nations to be a sovereign Nation retain exactly the same legal and political system it enjoyed as a colony without any change whatsoever to the basis for law. This point alone requires an answer.

The High Court has already answered with regard to the position held by treaties signed by the Commonwealth Government in the Teoh case of 1994. "Ordinary people have the right to expect government officials to consider Australia's international obligations even if those obligations are not reflected in specific Acts of Parliament: the rights recognised in international treaties are an implied limit on executive processes."

Article 36 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice is the correct reference for you to refuse to hear a matter when an international treaty is cited as a defence.

My advice is to adjourn any case "sine die" that that challenges the authority of the Letters Patent. Under no circumstances hear a case that challenges the validity of a State or the Federal Constitution. It is the politicians who are using us as pawns without them having to face the music. These matters are of concern to politicians, let them sort out these problems and accept any inherent risks themselves!

 

------------------------------------

 

21st February 2011

The attachment is absolutely fantastic & is another proof & admission from within the legal profession itself CONFIRMING what I have said for years

There is NO RULE of LAW within the Australian legal system so one can revert to International Law, or simply use (Aboriginals have Sovereign Law) the Creator's Laws or Contract Law.

It's not news the common folk should know about because many would behave dishonorably & chaos & mayhem would follow.

For those that act responsibly & honourably, this should be the signal for a huge party! Why?

Slavery is removed!

Everything is by contract. Offer & acceptance There is our remedy. We ought to be celebrating. The attachment should be emailed, faxed, deposited to every po-lice station in the country so they can see for themselves that their position is NOT legal & that WE KNOW IT! however, we do need them but they are on Notice that we know contract law rules & to leave us alone! We harm no-one so stop trying to fleece us & racketeer against us.

Are you not celebrating?

Perhaps we could all individually commit to distribute the attached doc to 4 po-lice stations each, so they are on NOTICE. Also each politician ought get a copy. Wouldn't they poo in their pants! They re the real liable party

Woohooo!

Mark

------------------------------------

21st February 2011

Hi Mark

FWIW, IMHO

I am sure I have sent this to you before and I agree with your comments below but if you take all that into account what protection do we have?

The Government are committing FRAUD on us and continuing to act as though the Constitution still exists so....... Like Sir Harry Gibbs did, (He, knowing the attached info from his letter, was instrumental as a founding member of the organisation "Australians for a Constitutional Monarchy") Used the government fraudulent activities to hold them to the rules they tried to portray to the rest of the public. The whole time knowing the truth could not be revealed by them. In essence he "played the game"

He even wrote to John Wilson in support of John Wilson and his accusations of the fraudulent Australia Act.

So I try to play the same way....... telling the government to live by the rules you created and have made public or lay your hand down and expose your fraud in this poker game of bluff ;)

Every time I see someone go to court with a sound argument/case of what should be the Rule of Law just gets defeated.

I don't know if the above makes sense as I am on the way out and rushed this but I know you will get the picture

God Bless

Mike

 

 

EMAIL LETTER FROM GARY MOON WHICH SHOWS THE SOLIDARITY OF THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA

Garry Moon (alchemyfurnituredesign@yahoo.com.au)

Add to contacts

28/05/2013

Documents

To: nnchin1@hotmail.com

Outlook Active View

2 attachments (total 125.0 KB)

Sir Harry Gibbs On The Australian Constitutional Crisis.doc

View online

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA IS A CORPORATION.doc

View online

Download all as zip

Hi Nicholas,

I was just now reading about your situation in the e-mail from "Democracy Defined".

 

I'm not a lawyer, however have been representing myself for four years now in the Supreme Court of Brisbane, against foreclosure.

 

What I have discovered through my research is that no Government in Australia, since 1919 has had any authority to even exist, let alone make, amend or repeal laws. This of course includes the courts, therefore any judgments made has no legal effect.

 

I have attached an essay from Sir Harry Gibbs, ex Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, who concludes THE EXISTANCE OF GOVERNMENT IN AUSTRALIA HAS NO BASIS IN LAW.

 

He refers to the so called constitutional crisis, which has existed since Australia achieved independance following the Treaty of Vesailles in 1919 following the second World War. Every Government since, has been no doubt aware of the problem, but not addressed it, and carried on with no legal authority.

 

The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution UK 1900 (an Act of the British parliament), formed the basis and foundation of our legal system, government etc, however ceased to be relevant following independance because it became an Act of a foreign government. Hence all figures of authority since have contiued to swear allegiance to a foreign power (the Queen).

 

Further evidence of this is the fact that no Governor General since, had been sworn in by the Queen, yet it remains the role of the Governor General to swear in Prime Ministers, Judges, Justices, State Governors etc. - this means these appointments are null and void.

 

To add to the Constitutional mess, you may be aware the Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Government, every state and state Government, including all subsidiaries are in fact Corporations masqerading as government, which gives them absolutely no authority whatsoever without consent arising from full disclosure.

 

I myself have sent letters to alleged Supreme Court Judges, the alleged Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the alleged State Attorney General, to validate their authority, but of course they can not, so ignore my requests.

 

We are constantly required to provide identification, but when we request it, they ignore us. That is because they are not obliged to as members of private corporations.

But of course the same goes for us. WE HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO ABIDE BY THE RULES OF A CORPORATION THAT WE ARE NOT EMPLOYED BY, NOR HAVE A VALID AND BINDING CONTRACT WITH.

 

Hope this helps

 

Regards

Garry moon