Personal Message from the Host:
Thursday, September 5th, 2013 SPECIAL GUEST SPEAKER Miguel (Mike) Cabrera shares his experience with his Quiet Title Action Success in California. See his case docs here http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Miguel-Cabrera.html This is going to be good! You wont want to miss it. *** Love, Angela ***
ReplyDeleteFrom: djfahey.cpo@hushmail.me
Sent: 06 September 2013 07:47
To: info@clrg.info
CC: iandenice@activ8.net.au, drew.hutton@foe.org.au, Charlie.F, Craig.WA, David.C, Debra.V, Henry.K, Jan.F, Jeff Forster, John McClymont, Jon.A, Lee & Michelle.W, Liz.B, Louise.F, Murray.S, NicholasC., Rowan.McC, Sandy, Peter.C
Subject: Re: [CLRG News] Land Use and CSG - what rights to property owners have (article)
In a de jure Australia, Assistant Professor Dr Tina Hunter would be correct. However that’s scenario hasn’t actually existed for some 94-years. As a result, Australian landowners and lease-holders do still have “the common Australian perception of rights over their land”, yet most are unaware of this realism.
I suggest the opposite prevails only because of the majority’s gullibility to stupidl y accept what we are told by ‘PERSONS’ who believe they have authority, are in or from a position of alleged authority, or having a perception of being learned. As a consequence of these illusion, the mainstream of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Australia then believe their situation is normal; thanks to the blitzkrieg of deception clouding the actual reality of their day to day lives.
Not realizing this fact, along with a lack of knowing or knowledge of their actual rights, few Australians are prepared to stand their dig. Furthe r, we the people own the Law of our Nation; it is not entirely the dominion of ‘Government’ and the ‘Courts’, but it belongs to all.
Therefore, I pose three (3) straightforward questions/observations in response to your email:
&nbs p;
1. When all present-day ‘ADMINISTRATIONS’ operates blatantly in breach of Section (8), (44), of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia Act (UK) 1900, i.e. the paramount tablet of Law in this Nation, how can the same ‘ADMINISTRATION’ lawful enforce access to any class/title of land under the pretext of Doctrine of Tenure?
2. &nb sp; Irrespective of Peter Beattie introducing the treasonable ‘Constitution of Queensland 2001’ to Parliament, and presuming it to be the primary ‘LAW’ of ‘QUEENSLAND’, it isn’t, as we still lawfully remain part of the Commonwealth of Australia. In doing so, Beattie removing all reference to Her Majesty and Crown, then replacing each with the word ‘STATE’, (representing the State government’s corporation, the Brigalow Corporation), along with voiding the document of lawful authority, by heading same with the copyrighted Public Seal of the Corporation. Therefore, how can any plausible claim exist for rights of or under the Crown?
ReplyDelete3. Finally, I accuse Assistant Professor Dr Tina Hunter of being guilty of the same deception implemented by the ‘STATE’ authorities. As she claims that both Sections 26 and 27 of the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 grant Crown rights to petroleum companies via existing Crown privileges accessed by the ‘STATE’. Sorry, they don’t!
i. Beattie severed any remaining linkage to the Crown (that’s if anything lawfully remaining following the 1919 incident) in 2001.
&n bsp; ii. Despite being also void owing to its display of the copyrighted Public Seal of the ‘STATE’ Corporation, this document contains no mention of Her Majesty, or the Crown, whatsoever, only the word ‘STATE’.
In closing my comment on this article, I post a famous statement from the one-time Australian High Court Chief Justice, Sir John Greig Latham, who is credited as once having said:< /span>“A pretend ‘LAW’ made in excess of power is not and never has been a Law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to discredit it”.
Sir John Greig Latham was an Australian judge and politician who served as fifth Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia for seventeen years, from 1935 to 1952.
That’s the CSG situation as I survey it.
Dennis Fahey (CPO)
On Thursday, 5 September 2013 at 3:49 AM, "CLRG Mailing List" wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: This i s a moderated mailing list.
Do NOT reply to this email.
Please send any correspondence to info@clrg.info
------------------------------------------------------------
Here is an interesting article I came across that discusses fee simple vs alloidial title and rights of the Crown vs property owners...
http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/20/land-use-and-csg-what-rights-do-property-owners-have/
------------------------------------------------------------
* Know Your Constitutional and Common Law Rights
* Are Licenses Illegal ?
* Are Fines Unlawful ? (unless imposed by a jury in a court)
* Is Tax Voluntary ?
Public educational meetings are held most months in Burwood, Hallam and Darnum in Victoria. See the website for more details.
Community Law Resource Group (Australia)
http:// www.CLRG.info
info@clrg.info
------------------------------------------------------------
You have received this email as a subscriber to the CLRG Mailing list. To unsubscribe or change your preferences, visit the link at the end of this email.
_______________________________________________
News mailing list
News@clrg.info
http://clrg.info/mailman/listinfo/news_clrg.info
2. &nb sp; Irrespective of Peter Beattie introducing the treasonable ‘Constitution of Queensland 2001’ to Parliament, and presuming it to be the primary ‘LAW’ of ‘QUEENSLAND’, it isn’t, as we still lawfully remain part of the Commonwealth of Australia. In doing so, Beattie removing all reference to Her Majesty and Crown, then replacing each with the word ‘STATE’, (representing the State government’s corporation, the Brigalow Corporation), along with voiding the document of lawful authority, by heading same with the copyrighted Public Seal of the Corporation. Therefore, how can any plausible claim exist for rights of or under the Crown?
ReplyDelete3. Finally, I accuse Assistant Professor Dr Tina Hunter of being guilty of the same deception implemented by the ‘STATE’ authorities. As she claims that both Sections 26 and 27 of the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 grant Crown rights to petroleum companies via existing Crown privileges accessed by the ‘STATE’. Sorry, they don’t!
i. Beattie severed any remaining linkage to the Crown (that’s if anything lawfully remaining following the 1919 incident) in 2001.
&n bsp; ii. Despite being also void owing to its display of the copyrighted Public Seal of the ‘STATE’ Corporation, this document contains no mention of Her Majesty, or the Crown, whatsoever, only the word ‘STATE’.
In closing my comment on this article, I post a famous statement from the one-time Australian High Court Chief Justice, Sir John Greig Latham, who is credited as once having said:< /span>“A pretend ‘LAW’ made in excess of power is not and never has been a Law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to discredit it”.
Sir John Greig Latham was an Australian judge and politician who served as fifth Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia for seventeen years, from 1935 to 1952.
That’s the CSG situation as I survey it.
Dennis Fahey (CPO)
On Thursday, 5 September 2013 at 3:49 AM, "CLRG Mailing List" wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: This i s a moderated mailing list.
Do NOT reply to this email.
Please send any correspondence to info@clrg.info
------------------------------------------------------------
Here is an interesting article I came across that discusses fee simple vs alloidial title and rights of the Crown vs property owners...
http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/20/land-use-and-csg-what-rights-do-property-owners-have/
------------------------------------------------------------
* Know Your Constitutional and Common Law Rights
* Are Licenses Illegal ?
* Are Fines Unlawful ? (unless imposed by a jury in a court)
* Is Tax Voluntary ?
Public educational meetings are held most months in Burwood, Hallam and Darnum in Victoria. See the website for more details.
Community Law Resource Group (Australia)
http:// www.CLRG.info
info@clrg.info
------------------------------------------------------------
You have received this email as a subscriber to the CLRG Mailing list. To unsubscribe or change your preferences, visit the link at the end of this email.
_______________________________________________
News mailing list
News@clrg.info
http://clrg.info/mailman/listinfo/news_clrg.info