Tuesday, February 24, 2026

PROTECTING MRS IRENE YOK MOY LEM

English: Irene is a weak and vulnerable person who has already been harmed once. This public record exists to protect her from further oppression and to ensure that no authority can act against her in darkness or silence.

中文:林玉梅女士体弱、脆弱,曾经遭受过一次伤害。本公开记录旨在保护她,防止任何进一步的压迫,并确保任何机关不得在黑暗中、在沉默中对她采取行动。

Bahasa Melayu: Puan Irene ialah seorang yang lemah dan mudah terdedah, dan telah pun disakiti sekali. Rekod awam ini diwujudkan untuk melindunginya daripada penindasan lanjut dan memastikan tiada pihak berkuasa boleh bertindak terhadapnya secara senyap atau tersembunyi.

A Message to Irene

English:
Irene, you are not alone. You have suffered enough, and everything written here is to protect you. No one has the right to frighten you or take from you again. This record exists so that every authority must act openly, fairly, and with full accountability. You are safe, and you are surrounded by people who will stand with you.

中文(简体):
玉梅,你并不孤单。你已经受了太多委屈,这里的一切都是为了保护你。
没有人再有权利吓唬你、伤害你或从你那里夺走任何东西。
这份公开记录让所有机关必须光明正大、公平透明地行事。
你是安全的,我们都会站在你身边。

Bahasa Melayu:
Irene, kamu tidak bersendirian. Kamu telah menanggung terlalu banyak kesakitan, dan segala yang ditulis di sini adalah untuk melindungi kamu. Tiada sesiapa berhak menakutkan kamu atau mengambil apa‑apa daripada kamu lagi. Rekod ini memastikan semua pihak berkuasa bertindak secara terbuka, adil dan bertanggungjawab. Kamu selamat, dan kami semua berdiri bersama

Closing Blessing

English:
May peace surround this home, may protection stand at every door, and may Irene be held in safety, dignity, and compassion. May truth prevail, and may every authority act with fairness and integrity.

中文(简体):
愿平安围绕这个家,愿保护守在每一扇门前,愿玉梅女士被安全、尊严与慈爱所环抱。
愿真理得以彰显,愿所有机关以公平与正直行事。

Bahasa Melayu:
Semoga kedamaian menyelubungi rumah ini, semoga perlindungan berdiri di setiap pintu, dan semoga Puan Irene dipelihara dalam keselamatan, maruah dan kasih sayang. Semoga kebenaran ditegakkan dan semua pihak berkuasa bertindak dengan adil dan berintegriti.

Message to Our Sons

English:
To our sons: your mother is protected, and her dignity is defended. This record stands as proof that your family acts with courage, unity, and truth. You are not alone in this journey — your strength and love are part of her protection.

中文(简体):
致我们的儿子们:你们的母亲受到保护,她的尊严受到捍卫。
这份记录证明了你们的家庭以勇气、团结与真理面对一切。
你们并不孤单——你们的力量与爱也是她的保护。

Bahasa Melayu:
Kepada anak‑anak kami: ibu kamu dilindungi, dan maruahnya dipertahankan. Rekod ini menjadi bukti bahawa keluarga kamu berdiri dengan keberanian, kesatuan dan kebenaran. Kamu tidak bersendirian — kekuatan dan kasih kamu adalah sebahagian daripada perlindungannya.

A Gentle Prayer

English:
May Irene’s heart be calmed, may her fears be lifted, and may she walk each day knowing she is protected. May justice guide every step taken by those in authority, and may peace return to this family.

中文(简体):
愿玉梅女士的心灵得以安宁,愿她的恐惧被解除,愿她每天都知道自己被保护着。
愿正义引导所有掌权者的每一步,愿平安回到这个家庭。

Bahasa Melayu:
Semoga hati Irene ditenangkan, semoga ketakutannya diangkat, dan semoga setiap hari dia mengetahui bahawa dia dilindungi. Semoga keadilan membimbing setiap langkah pihak berkuasa, dan semoga kedamaian kembali kepada keluarga ini.

English: This page is for Irene.

中文:此页面献给玉梅。

Bahasa Melayu: Halaman ini ditujukan untuk Irene.

Signature

English:
With love, protection, and unwavering commitment,
Nicholas N. Chin

中文(简体):
以爱、保护与坚定的承诺,
陈年发

Bahasa Melayu:
Dengan kasih sayang, perlindungan dan komitmen yang teguh,
Nicholas N. Chin

Family Creed

English:
In this family, we stand together. We protect the vulnerable, we speak the truth, and we do not fear injustice. Our strength is unity, our shield is integrity, and our path is honour.

中文(简体):
在这个家庭里,我们同心而立。
我们保护弱者,坚持真理,不畏不公。
我们的力量是团结,我们的盾牌是正直,我们的道路是荣誉。

Bahasa Melayu:
Dalam keluarga ini, kita berdiri bersama. Kita melindungi yang lemah, kita berkata benar, dan kita tidak gentar menghadapi ketidakadilan. Kekuatan kita ialah kesatuan, perisai kita ialah integriti, dan jalan kita ialah kehormatan.

English: Please share this page with all relevant authorities to ensure full transparency and accountability.

中文:请将此页面分享给所有相关机关,以确保完全的透明与问责。

Bahasa Melayu: Sila kongsikan halaman ini kepada semua pihak berkuasa yang berkaitan untuk memastikan ketelusan dan akauntabiliti sepenuhnya.


English:
This page stands as a record of truth, protection, and transparency. May all who read it act with fairness, integrity, and compassion.

中文(简体):
本页面作为真相、保护与透明的记录。 愿所有阅读此页的人以公平、正直与慈爱行事。

Bahasa Melayu:
Halaman ini menjadi rekod kebenaran, perlindungan dan ketelusan. Semoga semua yang membacanya bertindak dengan adil, berintegriti dan penuh belas kasihan.

— End of Public Record —

VOID ORDERS OF MAGISTRATE HALL – DURESS-INDUCED GUILTY PLEAS – UNLAWFUL FINANCIAL DEMANDS

City of Stirling v Irene Yok Moy Lem (PE 6810–6813/2018)

1. English

This public notice concerns the proceedings in City of Stirling v Irene Yok Moy Lem (PE 6810–6813/2018). On 9 December 2019, orders were made against Mrs Irene Yok Moy Lem in the Perth Magistrates Court before Magistrate Hall. Those orders are void ab initio for the following reasons:

  • Interpreter-entered pleas: The guilty pleas were not entered by Mrs Lem herself, but by the interpreter.
  • Duress and coercion: The pleas were induced by duress arising from coercive conduct by Spyker Legal.
  • No judicial inquiry: No proper inquiry was made by the magistrate into voluntariness, comprehension, or informed consent.
  • False factual premises: The factual premises relied upon were false, misleading, and untested.

A void order has no legal effect. It cannot be enforced, cannot be appealed, and cannot lawfully be used to extract money. Despite this, the City of Stirling has continued to issue financial demands and pursue enforcement against Mrs Lem.

These actions raise serious concerns about procedural fairness, misuse of authority, and discrimination against a vulnerable migrant woman with limited English. Multiple agencies and regulators have now been formally notified and requested to act within their statutory and administrative powers to prevent further harm and to address systemic failures.

Issued by: Nicholas N. Chin, for Mrs Irene Yok Moy Lem, Perth, Western Australia.


2. 简体中文

本公告涉及案件:Stirling 市议会 诉 林玉梅(Irene Yok Moy Lem)(PE 6810–6813/2018)。 2019 年 12 月 9 日,在珀斯地方法院 Hall 法官面前,对林玉梅女士作出的裁判命令 自始无效(void ab initio),理由如下:

  • 并非本人认罪:“认罪”并非由林女士亲自作出,而是由传译员代为表示。
  • 在胁迫下认罪:认罪是在 Spyker Legal 施加的压力和胁迫下作出。
  • 法官未作必要询问:法官没有就认罪是否自愿、是否真正理解及是否知情同意作出适当询问。
  • 事实基础错误:法院所依赖的事实基础是虚假、误导且未经检验的。

自始无效的命令在法律上毫无效力,不能被执行、不能作为有效上诉对象,也不能被用来向当事人索取金钱。 尽管如此,Stirling 市议会仍持续向林女士发出金钱要求并采取执行行动。

这些行为严重损害程序公正,构成权力滥用,并对一位英语能力有限的弱势移民妇女造成歧视。 多个机构和监管机关现已被正式通知,并被要求在其法定和行政权限范围内采取行动,防止进一步伤害并纠正系统性失误。

发布人: Nicholas N. Chin,代表林玉梅女士,西澳珀斯。


3. Bahasa Melayu

Notis awam ini berkaitan prosiding City of Stirling lwn Irene Yok Moy Lem (PE 6810–6813/2018). Pada 9 Disember 2019, perintah telah dibuat terhadap Puan Irene Yok Moy Lem di Mahkamah Majistret Perth di hadapan Majistret Hall. Perintah-perintah tersebut adalah batal dan tidak sah dari awal (void ab initio) atas sebab-sebab berikut:

  • Pengakuan bukan oleh beliau sendiri: Pengakuan bersalah tidak dibuat oleh Puan Lem sendiri, tetapi oleh jurubahasa.
  • Paksaan dan tekanan: Pengakuan itu dibuat di bawah paksaan dan tekanan daripada firma guaman Spyker Legal.
  • Tiada siasatan mahkamah yang mencukupi: Majistret tidak membuat siasatan sewajarnya tentang kerelaan, kefahaman dan persetujuan termaklum.
  • Fakta yang salah dan mengelirukan: Asas fakta yang digunakan adalah palsu, mengelirukan dan tidak pernah diuji.

Perintah yang batal dari awal tidak mempunyai apa-apa kesan undang-undang. Ia tidak boleh dikuatkuasakan, tidak boleh dijadikan asas rayuan, dan tidak boleh digunakan secara sah untuk menuntut wang. Namun begitu, City of Stirling masih meneruskan tuntutan kewangan dan tindakan penguatkuasaan terhadap Puan Lem.

Tindakan ini menimbulkan kebimbangan serius mengenai keadilan prosedur, penyalahgunaan kuasa dan diskriminasi terhadap seorang wanita migran yang lemah dengan keupayaan bahasa Inggeris yang terhad. Pelbagai agensi dan badan pengawas kini telah dimaklumkan secara rasmi dan diminta bertindak dalam bidang kuasa undang-undang dan pentadbiran masing-masing untuk mengelakkan mudarat lanjut dan menangani kegagalan sistemik.

Dikeluarkan oleh: Nicholas N. Chin, bagi pihak Puan Irene Yok Moy Lem, Perth, Australia Barat.

5 comments:

  1. Formal Notice – Protection of Vulnerable Person (Mrs Irene Yok Moy Lem)
    1 message
    Nicholas N CHIN Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 4:17 PM
    To: stirling@stirling.wa.gov.au, Mail Ombudsman , "BROWN, Tony" , lgi@dlgsc.wa.gov.au, "Info@afca.org.au" , sheriffwarrants@justice.wa.gov.au
    Attachments:

    Chronology of Events
    Evidence Bundle / Annexure List
    Public Tri‑Lingual Record (URL included below)
    To:
    City of Stirling – Chief Executive Officer / Director of Community Safety
    Local Government Inspectorate (WA) – Attn: Ms Kirsty Martin, Local Government Inspector
    Acting Executive Manager, Member Services (WALGA)
    Ombudsman Western Australia – Attn: Ombudsman Chris Field
    Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) – Case Management Team
    (Enforcement Authority) Sheriff’s Office – Department of Justice (WA) Criminal Enforcement / Warrants sheriffwarrants@justice.wa.gov.au

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    I write to place all recipient organisations on formal notice that Mrs Irene Yok Moy Lem is a vulnerable person who has already suffered significant harm as a result of previous unlawful or improper enforcement actions taken against her.

    Each organisation addressed in this letter is now expressly informed that:

    Irene is a vulnerable individual experiencing ongoing distress.
    Prior enforcement actions have caused serious psychological and physical harm.
    Any continuation of pressure, enforcement activity, or administrative conduct that may intimidate, distress, or disadvantage her would be wholly inappropriate and inconsistent with your statutory obligations, including fairness, proportionality, and the protection of vulnerable persons.
    This combined notice ensures that no authority can claim lack of awareness of Irene’s vulnerability or the harm already caused.

    To ensure full transparency and accountability, I provide the following materials:

    5. MASTER TIMELINE OF EVENTS (EVIDENCE‑BASED)
    2016–2018 – Builder’s Contractual Responsibility
    Irene entered into a HIA Home Building Contract (23 June 2016) with licensed builder Ian Jack, delegating all planning and building compliance responsibilities to him.
    “The HIA Home Building Contract delegates all planning and building compliance responsibilities to the builder.”

    8 January 2018 – SAT Mediation Agreement
    SAT Mediation Agreement CC2487/2017 executed.

    17 May 2019 – Magistrates Court Judgment
    Magistrates Court (PER/CTC/4423/2018) awarded $75,182.81 to Irene against builder Ian Jack.
    “The Court’s judgment confirms that the builder, not Mrs Lem, was at fault…”

    2019–2023 – City of Stirling Enforcement Despite Builder Liability
    City of Stirling pursued prosecution and enforcement despite builder liability and Irene’s good faith reliance on the builder.
    “Mrs Lem acted in good faith and has no mens rea or actus reus…”

    18 September 2023 – Admission of Liability by David Spencer
    David Spencer admitted non‑enforceability of fines totalling $56,552.60.

    4–8 October 2023 – Ministerial Correspondence
    Minister David Michael MLA issued letter 83‑01633.
    Nicholas and Irene replied detailing unlawful conduct by the City.

    2 January 2024 – Complaint #00615151 Acknowledged

    ReplyDelete
  2. 2 January 2024 – Complaint #00615151 Acknowledged
    City of Stirling confirmed receipt of Irene’s complaint.
    “The reference number for your Complaint is #00615151…”

    22 January 2024 – City Refuses to Engage
    Madeline states:
    “The City of Stirling has no further comment… No further response will be provided.”

    14 October 2025 – AFCA Non‑Enforceability Notice
    Irene notified AFCA, Westpac, Sheriff WA, and City of Stirling that Magistrate Hall’s order was void and non‑jurisdictional.
    Sheriff WA agreed to return $14,264.20.
    City of Stirling impliedly assented to non‑enforceability.

    14 October 2025 (Evening) – AFCA Request for Return of Funds
    Irene formally requested AFCA to direct Westpac to return the garnished funds.

    17 October 2025 – Request to City of Stirling to Withdraw Enforcement
    Irene and Nicholas requested formal withdrawal of enforcement.

    28 October 2025 – James Fletcher Refuses Withdrawal
    “The City does not intend to undertake any further review…”

    31 October 2025 – AFCA Submission of Additional Evidence
    Nicholas submitted full evidence bundle including statutory declaration, HIA contract, SAT agreement, payment schedule, and 331‑page indexed bundle.

    5 November 2025 – CCC Misconduct Report
    Nicholas lodged misconduct report with CCC.

    7 January 2026 – Clarification to Local Government Inspectorate
    Nicholas corrected Tony Brown’s misunderstanding.
    “My complaint concerns the conduct of the City, not the Court outcome…”

    21 January 2026 – Escalation to Director General Kylie Maj
    Nicholas notified DOJ and Inspectorate of:

    void Hall and Ward orders,
    plunder of Irene’s Westpac account,
    maladministration by City of Swan and City of Stirling.
    6. ANNEXURE INDEX (EVIDENCE LIST)
    Annexure A – Magistrates Court Judgment (PER/CTC/4423/2018)
    Annexure B – AFCA Non‑Enforceability Evidence (14 Oct 2025)
    Annexure C – AFCA Request for Return of Funds (14 Oct 2025)
    Annexure D – AFCA Additional Evidence Bundle (31 Oct 2025)
    Annexure E – Complaint #00615151 Confirmation (2 Jan 2024)
    Annexure F – Ministerial Correspondence (2023–2024)
    Annexure G – Admission of Liability by David Spencer (18 Sept 2023)
    Annexure H – James Fletcher Refusal Letter (28 Oct 2025)
    Annexure I – CCC Misconduct Report (5 Nov 2025)
    Annexure J – DOJ & Inspectorate Escalation (21 Jan 2026)
    7. PUBLIC TRI‑LINGUAL RECORD (Published Online)
    A public record has been published to ensure transparency and to protect Irene from further harm:

    https://wwwnicholasnchin.blogspot.com/

    8. AFCA Case Numbers (For Reference)
    HSBC: 12‑26‑353873
    Westpac: 12‑25‑301050
    Third matter: 363900
    REQUEST
    You are respectfully required to ensure that:

    No further enforcement or administrative pressure is directed toward Irene.
    All future dealings with her are conducted with care, sensitivity, and procedural integrity.
    Your officers, contractors, and decision‑makers are made aware of her vulnerability and the harm already caused.
    This notice is issued to protect a vulnerable person and to ensure that all recipient organisations are fully aware of their obligations.

    Yours faithfully,
    Nicholas N. Chin
    Acting on behalf of Mrs Irene Yok Moy Lem


    ReplyDelete
  3. 2 January 2024 – Complaint #00615151 Acknowledged
    City of Stirling confirmed receipt of Irene’s complaint.
    “The reference number for your Complaint is #00615151…”

    22 January 2024 – City Refuses to Engage
    Madeline states:
    “The City of Stirling has no further comment… No further response will be provided.”

    14 October 2025 – AFCA Non‑Enforceability Notice
    Irene notified AFCA, Westpac, Sheriff WA, and City of Stirling that Magistrate Hall’s order was void and non‑jurisdictional.
    Sheriff WA agreed to return $14,264.20.
    City of Stirling impliedly assented to non‑enforceability.

    14 October 2025 (Evening) – AFCA Request for Return of Funds
    Irene formally requested AFCA to direct Westpac to return the garnished funds.

    17 October 2025 – Request to City of Stirling to Withdraw Enforcement
    Irene and Nicholas requested formal withdrawal of enforcement.

    28 October 2025 – James Fletcher Refuses Withdrawal
    “The City does not intend to undertake any further review…”

    31 October 2025 – AFCA Submission of Additional Evidence
    Nicholas submitted full evidence bundle including statutory declaration, HIA contract, SAT agreement, payment schedule, and 331‑page indexed bundle.

    5 November 2025 – CCC Misconduct Report
    Nicholas lodged misconduct report with CCC.

    7 January 2026 – Clarification to Local Government Inspectorate
    Nicholas corrected Tony Brown’s misunderstanding.
    “My complaint concerns the conduct of the City, not the Court outcome…”

    21 January 2026 – Escalation to Director General Kylie Maj
    Nicholas notified DOJ and Inspectorate of:

    void Hall and Ward orders,
    plunder of Irene’s Westpac account,
    maladministration by City of Swan and City of Stirling.
    6. ANNEXURE INDEX (EVIDENCE LIST)
    Annexure A – Magistrates Court Judgment (PER/CTC/4423/2018)
    Annexure B – AFCA Non‑Enforceability Evidence (14 Oct 2025)
    Annexure C – AFCA Request for Return of Funds (14 Oct 2025)
    Annexure D – AFCA Additional Evidence Bundle (31 Oct 2025)
    Annexure E – Complaint #00615151 Confirmation (2 Jan 2024)
    Annexure F – Ministerial Correspondence (2023–2024)
    Annexure G – Admission of Liability by David Spencer (18 Sept 2023)
    Annexure H – James Fletcher Refusal Letter (28 Oct 2025)
    Annexure I – CCC Misconduct Report (5 Nov 2025)
    Annexure J – DOJ & Inspectorate Escalation (21 Jan 2026)
    7. PUBLIC TRI‑LINGUAL RECORD (Published Online)
    A public record has been published to ensure transparency and to protect Irene from further harm:

    https://wwwnicholasnchin.blogspot.com/

    8. AFCA Case Numbers (For Reference)
    HSBC: 12‑26‑353873
    Westpac: 12‑25‑301050
    Third matter: 363900
    REQUEST
    You are respectfully required to ensure that:

    No further enforcement or administrative pressure is directed toward Irene.
    All future dealings with her are conducted with care, sensitivity, and procedural integrity.
    Your officers, contractors, and decision‑makers are made aware of her vulnerability and the harm already caused.
    This notice is issued to protect a vulnerable person and to ensure that all recipient organisations are fully aware of their obligations.

    Yours faithfully,
    Nicholas N. Chin
    Acting on behalf of Mrs Irene Yok Moy Lem


    ReplyDelete
  4. Date: 2nd February, 2026.
    RE: VOID ORDERS OF MAGISTRATE HALL — DURESS‑INDUCED GUILTY PLEAS — UNLAWFUL FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST MRS IRENE YOK MOY LEM
    This consolidated notice is issued to all relevant agencies, regulators, and oversight bodies. The orders made by Magistrate Hall on 9 December 2019 in City of Stirling v Irene Yok Moy Lem (PE 6810–6813/2018) are void ab initio.
    The guilty pleas were not entered by the accused, were entered by the interpreter, were induced by duress from Spyker Legal, were accepted without inquiry into voluntariness, and were based on false and misleading factual premises.
    A void order cannot be enforced, cannot be appealed, and cannot be used to extract money.
    All parties are instructed to cease and desist from any further financial demands or enforcement actions.

    AHRC LETTER
    Email: infoservice@humanrights.gov.au
    Subject: Human Rights Complaint – Void Court Orders and Coercive Legal Conduct Against Mrs Irene Lem
    To the Australian Human Rights Commission,
    I notify the Commission of serious human rights concerns arising from the proceedings in City of Stirling v Irene Yok Moy Lem. The orders are void because the guilty pleas were entered under duress, without informed consent, and not by the accused herself.
    Mrs Lem is a migrant woman with limited English, pressured by Spyker Legal, who refused to run her defence unless she paid a higher fee. The interpreter entered the plea. No inquiry into voluntariness occurred.
    This constitutes denial of procedural fairness, discrimination based on language and vulnerability, exploitation, financial coercion, and unequal access to justice.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    MINISTER FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    Emails: David.Michael@mp.wa.gov.au; Minister.Michael@dpc.wa.gov.au
    Subject: Request for Ministerial Oversight – City of Stirling Acting on Void Court Orders
    Dear Minister Michael,
    The City of Stirling continues to rely on void court orders issued in City of Stirling v Irene Yok Moy Lem. The guilty pleas were invalid, entered by the interpreter, and induced by coercive legal conduct.
    The City’s continued pursuit of penalties raises issues of maladministration, improper enforcement, and misuse of local government powers.
    Your intervention is required.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    WALGA LETTER
    Email: kirsty.martin@walga.asn.au
    Subject: Request for WALGA Review – City of Stirling’s Reliance on Void Orders
    Dear Ms Martin,
    I request WALGA’s review of the City of Stirling’s conduct in enforcing void orders against Mrs Irene Lem. The City continues to pursue penalties arising from a legally invalid conviction.
    The transcript shows the interpreter entered the plea, the magistrate failed to confirm voluntariness, and the plea was induced by coercion.
    This is a systemic governance failure requiring WALGA’s attention.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    CITY OF STIRLING LETTER
    Email: stirling@stirling.wa.gov.au
    Subject: Cease and Desist – Enforcement of Void Orders Against Mrs Irene Lem
    To the Chief Executive Officer,
    The orders issued in City of Stirling v Irene Yok Moy Lem are void. The City must cease all enforcement, financial demands, and administrative actions.
    The plea was not entered by the accused, was induced by duress, and the conviction has no legal effect.
    Any further attempt to extract money will be treated as unlawful financial pressure.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    MAGISTRATES COURT LETTER
    Email: PerthMagistratesCourt@justice.wa.gov.au
    Subject: Notice of Void Orders – Request for Administrative Correction
    To the Court Manager,
    The orders made by Magistrate Hall on 9 December 2019 are void due to an invalid plea. The interpreter entered the plea, not the accused, and no inquiry into voluntariness occurred.
    I request that the Court correct the record and confirm that no enforcement action will proceed.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    ReplyDelete
  5. LPCC LETTER
    Email: enquiries@lpbwa.com
    Subject: Professional Misconduct Complaint – Spyker Legal Coercion of Guilty Plea
    To the LPCC,
    I lodge a complaint regarding Spyker Legal’s conduct. Spyker refused to run the defence unless a higher fee was paid, pressured Mrs Lem into a guilty plea, ignored instructions, misled the court, and exploited her vulnerability.
    This conduct caused a void conviction and financial harm.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    SPYKER LEGAL LETTER
    Email: admin@spykerlegal.com.au
    Subject: Formal Notice – Your Conduct Rendered the Court Orders Void
    To Spyker Legal,
    Your conduct in City of Stirling v Irene Yok Moy Lem rendered the orders void. You pressured your client into a guilty plea, refused instructions, demanded higher fees, allowed the interpreter to enter the plea, and failed to ensure informed consent.
    Your actions are under review.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    OMBUDSMAN WA LETTER
    Email: mail@ombudsman.wa.gov.au
    Subject: Request for Investigation – Maladministration and Enforcement of Void Orders
    To the Ombudsman of Western Australia,
    I request an investigation into the City of Stirling’s enforcement of void court orders against Mrs Irene Lem. The orders were based on an invalid plea entered under duress.
    The City’s continued pursuit of penalties constitutes maladministration and improper exercise of power.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    PAC LETTER – CHAIR
    Email: public.admin@parliament.wa.gov.au
    Subject: Request for Parliamentary Oversight – Systemic Failures in Local Government and Court Processes
    To the Chair, Public Administration Committee,
    I request oversight into systemic failures involving the City of Stirling, Spyker Legal, and the Magistrates Court. The conviction is void due to invalid pleas, coercion, and lack of procedural fairness.
    These failures raise issues of governance breakdown and misuse of enforcement powers.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin

    PAC LETTER – MEMBERS
    Email: public.admin@parliament.wa.gov.au
    Subject: Notice to Committee Members – Void Orders and Systemic Governance Failures
    To the Members of the Public Administration Committee,
    I notify the Committee of systemic failures involving the City of Stirling, Spyker Legal, and the Magistrates Court. The conviction is void due to an invalid plea entered by the interpreter and coercive legal conduct.
    Parliamentary attention is required.
    Signed,
    Nicholas N. Chin


    ReplyDelete